Justice in “The Mistake by the Lake!”

March 19, 2010

Cleveland that is!  From Cleveland.com, by way of James Edwards at The Political Cesspool:

“CLEVELAND, Ohio — A former Bedford Heights city employee who claimed she was discriminated against by Mayor Fletcher Berger and others because of her race and disability was awarded $1.83 million in pay and damages by a federal jury on Monday.”…

In the 20 months after Berger took office, 38 of the 41 workers the city hired in its community life department, which includes the recreation center, were African-American, Hinners said.”

Wow…a jury agreed to that?   I wonder where the actual trial was held.  I know there’s no way in hell they found one of those inherently evil “all white jury” ‘s in a rat-hole like Cleveland.  I know there are some misguided whites out there who still think that it’s “dishonorable” for them to file discrimination lawsuits…I used to be one of them myself.  But it’s not about “being better” than minorities, it’s about competing with them for survival in a system rigged to ensure your displacement.  Yes, there is something inherently dishonorable about bringing brass knuckles to a fair boxing match with an impartial referee, and a well-intentioned and unarmed opponent.  But there is absolutely nothing wrong with bringing a baseball bat to a ring in an empty arena where your opponent has a baseball bat, and the ref wants you dead, even if they still call it a “boxing match.”  You’re not “cheating” by filing reverse discrimination lawsuits because it’s not a fair contest to begin with.  Bringing a knife to a gunfight doesn’t make you brave…just stupid.  James Edwards’ thoughts:  “Better cash in while you can, white folks.” 

My thoughts:

“File a complaint…what do you have to lose?…pride?…you think being on unemployment won’t take that away from you anyway?  Perhaps the main complaint is that men don’t want to feel like “whiners” by saying they were discriminated against, but just remember, minorities and women do this all the time.  Not doing the same thing in return doesn’t make you better than them when the result is losing your livelihood.  Somebody who willingly agrees to bring only a knife to a gunfight isn’t brave…they’re stupid.  Even if you can’t prove that you were chosen to be laid-off because you are white and/or male…who cares…file anyway.  Clog the system with so many complaints that it overloads!  Even if your claim is found to be unsupported, the 5 seconds that it takes under-qualified and over-paid EEOC government employee Shaniqua to sigh in disgust, crumble it up, and throw it away, is 5 seconds that she now won’t have available to harass an honest white employer facing a bogus discrimination lawsuit.  File! Baby! File!”

$1.83 million…looks like Cleveland won’t be getting that new “Hate Crimes Unit” for its Police Department or “Museum of Tolerance” after all.  Who am I kidding…they’ll still get them.  It’s just that now, whites in Kansas and Montana will pay for them in the form of a federal grant. 

“38 of the 41 workers the city hired in its community life department, which includes the recreation center, were African-American”…If you eliminated every government job, every job in “Human Resources,” and every job with the words “community” or “diversity” in the title, the unemployment rate for black women would be like 98%.


“Conservatives” will be okay with “zero tolerance” this time around.

March 15, 2010

A favorite pastime of the Fox News/beltway conservative crowd is bashing the “zero tolerance” policies regarding “violence” at schools.  Examples of boyscouts being suspended for bringing dangerous safety-pins to school are held up for ridicule…and rightly so.  But a new “zero-tolerance” wind is blowing in from the east (Washington D.C. or Africa…take your pick), and this one will apply only to white students.

From the Wall Street Journal, by way of The Council of Conservative Citizens:

“The Obama administration plans to crack down on civil-rights infractions in school districts and university systems, including alleged disparities in the disciplining of white and black students.

The campaign will essentially put an enforcement stick behind the carrot of the administration’s $4.35 billion Race to the Top program, which holds out the promise of extra federal funding if states revamp their education policies. While Race to the Top will reward school reforms, the civil-rights push will emphasize the potential to punish offending schools.

States found to be violating laws designed to assure equal treatment in education could, in extreme cases, face litigation or a withholding of federal school funding, U.S. education officials said. They portrayed the move as an effort to make up for years of lax enforcement under the previous administration.”

Noting that “currently blacks students on average are three times more likely to be suspended,” the CofCC sums it up nicely:

School administrators are already in fear of punishing black students, and it is getting worse every day. Yet Obama wants to make it worse. Obama’s program calls for punishments and litigation against schools who don’t improve the imbalance in suspension rates between the races. This means that schools will have to suspend whites for doing something a third less severe than what a black student is currently suspended for, or black students will have to be suspended only when they do something three times more severe than what they are currently being suspended for!”

They are absolutely right.  Blacks are suspended from school at a higher rate than whites because they misbehave at a higher rate than whites.  This…what’s the juvenile delinquent equivalent of the dreaded “achievement gap?”…”punishment gap” can only be closed in one of two ways:

1.  Punishing white students for trivial/minor offenses for which minorities get a pass.

2.  Allowing black students to get away with serious/major offenses for which white students would be punished.

In reality, a combination of both will happen.  Either way, it’s a two-tiered disciplinary system for white students.  Black students will do bad things, like steal from other students’ lockers.  Then, when they aren’t punished for it, because the black suspension quota for the semester has already been filled, they will be encouraged, and will steal even more.  When the school administrators finally have enough, and suspend the multiple offender, they’ll need to suspend a couple of white kids also…lest the ratio get too imbalanced.  As all white offenders have already been suspended…any two will have to do!  So that means that the next kid who shows up to class 5 minutes late, or talks in class, is going to have the hammer dropped on him

My question is this…when the day comes that a white kid gets expelled for chewing gum…will Hannity et al. highlight his plight, and point out how ridiculous and unjust the punishment was? Of course not…because it was done in the name of fighting racial injustice, and if Hannity and friends cannot bring themselves to admit that there are racial differences in behavior, then the only explanation for racial differences in punishment would be…white racism.  Hannity will probably end up calling the kid a terrorist…and recommend that we “rendition” this little bastard to Guantanamo Bay for some water-boarding.  Just tell the Wall Street Journal that he was an anti-semite…that should placate their sense of justice.

How does the Disparate Planet plan for dealing with a hostile elite fit in here?:

“Divorce yourself as much as possible from American institutions, which actively seek to displace you, so that you no longer have an interest in whether or not they collapse.”

Simple…If you can afford to, homeschool your kids!

Wonder if they’ll be charged with “hate crimes?”

March 13, 2010

Two more incidents of blacks attacking whites, and boldly proclaiming the racial motivation behind the attacks:

First, from Cincinnati, via Nation of Cowards:

“Black, dubbed the Lytle Park rapist because one of his victims was raped at 9 a.m. in the Downtown public park, became a poster child for those calling for a new jail. Before the May 4 incident was reported, Black had been arrested five times in the previous six months but released each time because there was no room in the jail for him.”

“Black had been arrested five times in the previous six months but released each time because there was no room in the jail for him.”…Detroit, Cincinnati, Zimbabwe…Black Rule leads to the same result no matter where it occurs…failure.

“She was a student at a West End school when she went Feb. 18, 2009, to Over-the-Rhine to buy marijuana. She met Black, 21, who asked to borrow her cell phone so he could make the deal. He took her inside an Over-the-Rhine, building and to the third-floor landing. When they stopped climbing stairs, the girl was trapped and knew she was in trouble.

Nobody cares about a white b—- in Over-the-Rhine,” Black told her, court documents note.”

Will he be charged with a hate crime?  I couldn’t find an answer one way or another (let me know if you find out)…but I wouldn’t hold my breath.

The second story comes from Dallas, via American Renaissance:

AmRen has an interesting notation:

[The above story is a copy cached by Yahoo! The current version of the story differs in many respects from this cached version; in particular, the passage in boldface has been excised. The current version of the story can be read here.]”

I couldn’t get the link to work.  Another great example of media objectivity if you ask me!  The passage referred to is this:

When Pfeifle, the prosecutor, asked if Lacey showed any remorse, LaShaunda Johnson replied: “He said if it made me feel better, I could just think she was prejudiced.” She testified that according to her boyfriend, Reiter probably didn’t like black people, “and her family probably owned slaves.””

This is the murderer discussing his killing of the victim.  The motivation sounds pretty clear to me.  Again, I was unable to find out whether or not he was charged with a “hate crime,” but I highly doubt it.

These are just two of many examples of the two-tiered legal system that whites face in the form of “hate crimes” laws.  If a white person commits an offense against a minority, “hate” is automatically presumed to be the motivation.  If a minority commits an offense against a white, and explicitly states the racial motivation behind the crime, then…well…all of a suddent “hate crimes” laws aren’t such a vital law enforcement tool.  I would be interested to know if any whites in these two jurisdictions have been charged with “hate crimes.”  If they have, especially with less evidence as to motivation, it would appear to be selective enforcement of these laws.  I’ve already documented two examples where whites were charged with “hate crimes,” and later on, in the same exact jurisdiction, minorities committed crimes against whites, with explicit racial motivation, without resulting “hate crimes” charges.  If there are any attorneys out there who might know the legal requirements for appealing a case based on “selective enforcement”, please contact me and let me know.  Also, if you have any other examples where, in the same jurisdiction, whites who committed crimes against minorities were charged with “hate crimes,” and minorities who committed crimes against whites, with explicit racial motivation, were not, please let me know.

So far, the Disparate Planet First Law of Interracial Crime has yet to be disproven:

“Any crime committed by whites against a minority will result in additional charges/prison time.  Any crime committed against whites by minorities will be met with the bare minimum of charges/prison time…if that.”

Another tradition that whites will have to get over very soon is their deification of law enforcement.  The criminal justice system has ceased to function in support of the interests of white communities, and is now essentially the enforcement arm of our hostile elite, or white Peter Brimelow referred to as our “minority occupation government.”  Whites for some reason still think that the criminal justice system really wants to protect them from dangerous minorities.  Just remember…when their superiors tell them to stop focusing on trivial offenses such as assault and murder, and instead focus on real crimes, such as a harmless sign in some white guy’s front yard…they’ll say “yes sir” and drag him off to jail without a second thought.

You really should click  the link about the yard sign.  It includes this priceless gem:

““I’m telling you this is what I was, was ready to go to jail today and take that noose down,” said community activist Queen Sister, with It Takes a Village.”

If we were playing “Guess My Occupation,” and you gave me the name “Queen Sister,” my first two choices would be either “community activist” or “unemployed”…looks like I was right!

Missouri Penal Code – Section 27g: Bias-Motivated-Felony-Crime-Reporting

March 11, 2010

Okay, I’m just kidding.  I don’t think that that’s an actual codified crime in the state of Missouri…yet.

James Edwards at The Political Cesspool covers a Council of Conservative Citizens report:

“In the Waldo neighborhood of Kansas City, a serial rapist is on the loose. He’s black, and the police have released a sketch of the suspect based on interviews with the victims. The other day a white man saw a black man in the area who matched the description, so he called the cops. Now “civil rights leaders” are demanding that the police charge the white man with “ethnic intimidation, i.e. a hate crime, for being a good citizen.”

So far, I haven’t heard whether or not this good samaritan has actually been charged with anything…but it wouldn’t surprise me if he has or will be.  I’m constantly told by the supporters of “hate crimes” laws that the thought behind the crime isn’t being punished, just the amount of “cold-bloodedness” that went into its commission.  The example always given is that pre-meditated murder is usually punished more harshly than murder committed in the heat of passion.  But the unjustifiable homicide itself is still a crime, the motivation behind it just influences how harsh the sentence is.  That isn’t the case here.  A citizen calling in a police tip, in good faith, which turns out to be incorrect, is not a crime.  Unless of course it’s a white citizen reporting a black citizen.  So this isn’t a case of motivation influencing the harshness of a sentence, it’s a case of race determining whether or not a crime even occurred.  This is yet another example of the two-tiered legal system that whites face.  The governments that rule you, at all levels from local to federal, would love nothing more than to throw you in jail for life if you even so much as offend the delicate sensibilities of a minority!

U…S…A…U…S…A…U…S…A…What’s that?…You’re not chanting along?…What are you?…Some kind of liberal/commie/terrorist?…Nothing a Sean Hannity “Freedom Concert” (at least I think that’s what they’re called) won’t fix!

So the next time you hear that moron Hannity or some other GOP hack complaining about Democrats being “soft on crime” because they want to spend money on welfare for minorities instead of on funding for law enforcement, just remember this…that money probably would have just gone to fund the department’s new “Hate Crimes Unit” anyway.

Drop out of American Institutions…Build Your Own…Prosper.

Carly Fiorina: Quota-Queen

March 10, 2010

Via Politico:

Apparently Arianna Packard, whose only claim to fame is being “the granddaughter of HP co-founder David Packard,” has written a letter to several Republicans trashing the business performance of California Republican Senatorial candidate Carly Fiorina…whose only claim to fame is nearly running that company into the ground.

From the letter:

““I know a little bit about Carly Fiorina, having watched her almost destroy the company my grandfather founded. So, allow me to disillusion you of a few of your stated reasons for supporting her,” Packard wrote.


“Most business commentators consider Fiorina’s tenure at HP to be a disaster,” Packard continued. “The stock price dropped by 50% only to rally 10% on the announcement of her firing. She fired 28,000 people before she herself was fired, departing with the 21 million dollar golden parachute that is financing her campaign.””

Ouch.  What’s amazing isn’t so much her disastrous tenure at HP, which might have been expected, but that after she was fired, she continued to have a career in the business world and that others would ask for her opinion, including the poorly-run McCain campaign, who brought her on board as an economic advisor/spokeswoman.  Her job was to make McCain look good on economic issues, admittedly an almost hopeless task.  Apparently computers and politics aren’t that different, because she failed miserably here too, stating in an interview that “I don’t think John McCain could run a major corporation.”  She’s right of course…but apparently she couldn’t run one either…as evidenced by the fact that she was FIRED!  Made a CEO by political correct corporate types…runs the company into the ground.  Made a political spokeswoman…makes her candidate look bad.  Made the GOP-frontrunner by the Republican establishment…well…I guess we’ll just have to wait to see how that turns out. 

Funny…when I fail at something, there are negative consequences.  Must be that “glass ceiling” I’m always hearing about!

In related news, Vietnam veteran (just kidding!) David Frum seems to think that women should be allowed in combat units (I won’t link directly to the article out of principle.  Frum didn’t write it, but it appears at his site.).  The logic seems to be this:  female IDF soldiers do a good job of harassing unarmed Palestinian farmers, there are substandard male soldiers as well, and some woman rode in a supply convoy without killing everyone around her, so there are now no physical/emotional/psychological differences between the genders, and Sgt. Fiorina (loaded down with gear) will be able to carry her wounded 200 lbs. comrade (also loaded down with gear) to safety just as easily as a 195 lbs. 19 year old young man in his prime could.  I’m sure she’ll have no problem putting on a flak jacket with inserts, a helmet, a pack, a weapon, ammunition, and crew-served weapons gear and hiking 15 miles in the desert either.  At first thought I was upset by this stupid suggestion, but since I’m no longer in the military, the operational efficiency of the IDF’s foreign legion doesn’t matter as much to me any more.  Apparently the philo-semite approach to dealing with a hostile Jewish elite, “trying to convince the organized Jewish community that their interests will be better served by an America not entirely void of White [male] influence”…” ‘A White-led U.S. military would do a better job of crushing Israel’s enemies than one led by quota-hires’…”…is no longer even an option.  I guess our elites have decided to make up on quanitity what we lack in quality.  “So what if (now General) Fiorina failed to save (Pat Buchanan’s proverbial) McAllister?”  “Plenty of Scots-Irish kids in Tennessee to take his place.”  I guess that just leaves my approach:  “Divorce myself as much as possible from American institutions, which actively seek to displace me, so that I no longer have an interest in whether or not they collapse.”

Well, there’s always the Sailer approach (he’s actually unbelievably outstanding on just about everything else):  “Hope that if we just write enough praising columns about David Brooks, we can finally convince him and some of his more radical co-ethnics to actually care more about the life of some Scots-Irish farmboy than about some abstract concept like ‘diversity’.”

I guess anything’s possible…

“Disparate Protection” Strikes Again?

March 9, 2010

It appears that we may have another case of “disparate protection,” where a law enforcement agency either cracks down on an offender harder, or puts forth less effort trying to protect a victim due to that offender/victim being White.  Just like in Shenandoah, Pennsylvania, where a Hispanic woman attacked whites with clear racial motivation and was not charged with a “hate crime,” yet where White men who attacked a Hispanic man were charged with “hate crimes,” comes this incident from Howard Beach in Queens, New York:

Via AmRen, from the Queens Chronicle:


On Feb. 8, Phyllis, a 45-year-old white Howard Beach resident who has requested her last name be omitted for this article, left her place of employment on Crossbay Boulevard at around 3:15 p.m. to cross the street and purchase a pack of Marlboro’s and a can of soda from C-Town grocery store, located at the corner of Sutter Avenue and Crossbay.


{snip} Having completed her purchases, she prepared to cut across Crossbay and return to work, not expecting to encounter trouble from a group of about 12 teens—which included the boy and girl with whom she had exchanged words in front of C-Town—that had congregated on the corner across the boulevard from Cookie’s.

“As I was walking by, the boy told the girl ‘oh look, here comes that b**** again, she’s gonna f*** with you,’” Phyllis said. “The girl then approached me and said, ‘I know you didn’t cross the street to f*** with me, you white b****.’”

Phyllis said she repeated to the girl that she should be more respectful and the girl, in turn, slapped Phyllis’ hand. Almost immediately, four of the teens jumped on the woman, kicking and beating her. They stole her cell phone and left her on the ground, fleeing when the police showed up.”

If Howard Beach sounds familiar to you…it should.  It was the scene of two past infamous “hate crimes,” both of these involving White offenders and black victims.  The most recent, in 2005, resulted in “hate crimes” charges being filed against at least one white offender, according to the New York Times:

“The police said they had taken Nicholas Minucci, a 19-year-old unemployed man from Howard Beach, into custody, and a senior law enforcement official said he would be charged with assault in the first degree as a hate crime

I haven’t been able to find out whether or not the White offenders in the older incident were charged with “hate crimes,” but I know that the incident has been widely documented.

So…when Whites attack blacks, with supposed racial motivation, there are “hate crimes” charges, in addition to charges for the actual assault.  When blacks attack a White victim, in the same town, clearly explaining their racial motivation, there are…well…as far as I can tell…no “hate crimes” charges yet.  I guess that could change…but I’m not exactly holding my breath.  I guess law enforcement just has more pressing concerns at the moment.  Anybody got one of those “thin blue line” stickers I can have?  Gotta show my support for mandatory diversity’s iron-fisted enforcers.  Just seems to reinforce the Disparate Planet First Law of Interracial Crime:

“Any crime committed by whites against a minority will result in additional charges/prison time.  Any crime committed against whites by minorities will be met with the bare minimum of charges/prison time…if that.”

I really need to start writing these down…

If the whites who read about this incident were smart, they would begin dropping out of American Institutions, forming their own, and learning how to protect themselves.  However, for those few that still manage to even get upset about this injustice, I’m sure most will get just mad enough to TiVo Hannity and maybe, if their blood’s really up, read themselves to sleep with a copy of Going Rogue.   Never fear…the deliverance of McCain/Romney/Palin/Gingrich/GOP hack of your choice ’12 is just around the corner!

The College Pogroms Continue!

March 5, 2010

I’m constantly told that Eastern European pogroms in the old days started something like this:  Drunken Slavic peasant takes a break from beating his wife long enough to hear a story about Jews ritually murdering children or some outlandish tale (the infamous “blood libel”), then gets all fired up and goes out and commits mass murder.

Nooses, pillow cases on statues, swastika graffiti, and now cotton balls are the new blood libel against whites.  Hoaxes committed by minorities to justify their repression against us.  I’m almost not joking.  If you haven’t been following the events at UC – San Diego, Ellison Lodge’s Vdare.com article is a great place to start.

So, after the infamous “Compton Cookout” mocking blacks, which turns out to have been the brainchild of a black comedian…and then the magic noose…which turns out to have been planted by a minority…we now have a…wait for it…a sheet left on the head of a statue of Dr. Suess.  Apparently even the FBI is investigating this “crime of the century!”  Ellison Lodge and James Fulford think that this is another hoax.  Ellison Lodge and James Fulford are probably right.  It appears that even the draconian measures that the college has taken to crack down on whites are not enough.  According to James Edwards, one Hebrew columnist even wants the National Guard called in to crack down on uppity whites.  He’ll probably get his way at this rate.  It’s amazing how a piece of cloth can absolutely shut down the functioning of what could be called black “society” on campus.  Why was anybody surprised at the effect something as big as a hurricane had on Haiti?

Now another “incident.”  A picture of a noose was scribbled on a bathroom door at UC – Santa Cruz!  That’s right…not even an actual noose…just a drawing of one.  The usual “zero tolerance” crackdown has begun.  I’m pretty sure that in the next couple of days UC – Santa Cruz will announce that all whites on campus are now under house arrest.

But it doesn’t stop there.  In the first incident mentioned actually proven not to be a hoax, two white students were arrested for the horrific crime of…dropping cotton balls on the ground in front of the black student center!  It’s being called a “hate crime,” and these two young men are being charged with a felony!  James Fulford calls it “felony littering.”  I’m sure a felony could bring them jail time.  I’m always told by supporters of hate crimes laws that they’re not actually criminalizing the thought behind the crime…they’re just taking it into account as motivation when they sentence the offender…kind of like premeditated murder is punished more harshly than murder committed in the heat of passion.  But the likely sentence for littering has got to be what…a fine…community service?  When the punishment for the “motivation” is more than the punishment for the actual crime itself, then yeah…you ARE criminalizing the thought behind the action.

Again, this is the two-tiered legal system that whites face.  Four whites get beaten, two of them to death, by blacks at Kent State within the last few months.  Law enforcement could care less.   Cotton balls get dropped on the ground and all of a sudden the road blocks and barricades go up, and SWAT team snipers are positioned on the rooftops.  Remember that the next time you put one of those stupid blue-ribbon/”thin blue line” stickers on the back of your car.  I’m sure the police officer arresting you, for looking cross-eyed at a black guy who cut you off in traffic, will take it easy on you as a result.  It doesn’t matter how many times these minor incidents of vandalism are proven to be hoaxes, the crack down on whites will just keep getting worse.  They are a pretext, not a reason.  The next time an empty water bottle is left on a campus park bench, I expect the college administration to strip search all white students, and randomly expel any of them who has a Social Security number ending in “6”…gotta set an example you know…hey, blacks were brought over here on slave ships…across the Atlantic Ocean…which is full of water!!!  That empty bottle was obviously a thinly-veiled threat.  Hate crimes hoaxes are a blood libel against whites, and a pretext for college administrators to launch anti-white pogroms.  The police won’t save you from getting beat to death because they’re too busy running down leads at a local CVS (somebody had to purchase those cotton balls).  You might want to learn how to fend for yourself.

Africa Got Served!!!

March 4, 2010

Apparently blacks can’t even win a “stepping” competition without affirmative action.  The Council of Conservative Citizens brings us the story:

“A white sorority from Arkansas beat a number of black sororities in a dance competition in Atlanta. The competition was sponsored by Sprite of the Coca-Cola company and the winners were to receive $100k worth of scholarships.

Immediately after the competition black columnists screamed “racism.” Black internet users have posted thousands of messages on YouTube and other websites complaining that whites had won the mostly black competition. Many complained that a white team was even allowed to compete, and demanded that future competitions be “black only.”

Well, screaming and complaining about made up slights pays off apparently. To appease the black community Coca-Cola has retroactively named the second place team as a “co 1st place winner.” The black sorority that came in second had their prize scholarships upgraded to equal the amount given to the white sorority from Arkansas.”

From an Associated Press article in The Washington Post:

“Now a white Arkansas team’s win in an Atlanta step competition has started a fiery debate over the African-inspired tradition and whether the integration of a once-ethnically exclusive activity constitutes a form of cultural theft.”

Wouldn’t a form of…culture…need to be stolen in order to constitute “cultural theft.”  Clapping and stomping your feet to a set rhythm is the underlying concept of most “Barney” DVD’s.  I guess you could compare a purple dinosaur to ancient Greek Philosophy.

“”What has happened is black youth culture, what people would call hip hop, sort of made black culture accessible and appealing to all kinds of people,” said Walter Kimbrough, president of historically black Philander Smith College in Little Rock, Ark., and an expert on black Greek life. “It really now has become an American experience.” “

“An expert on black Greek life?!?!”  They have those?  Has the American quest for knowledge reached such a pinnacle of greatness that we now, after having mastered such basic concepts as addition, and such advanced subjects as quantam physics, have enough time on our hands to devote our studies to the social theories behind the intricate workings of black fraternities and sororities.  Shouldn’t we try to become experts on Chemical Engineering or Pharmaceutical Research instead?

“A YouTube video of their performance, inspired by the movie “The Matrix,” generated hundreds of comments….”Good Job but let the Black folks have their own thing for once!!!” wrote one commenter posting under the name “titetowers” who said the Zeta Tau Alpha [the white sorority]team did well but should not have won.”

I couldn’t agree more “titetowers.”  Why don’t you guys leave fields like, oh…Medicine, Science, and the Law to us…and you can have “stepping” all to yourselves.

“On Thursday, sponsor Coca-Cola announced “scoring discrepancies” and said the runner-up – the Alpha Kappa Alpha [black]team from Indiana University, whose members are black – would share first place and receive the same $100,000 in scholarships that the Zeta Tau Alphas won.

It was unclear what the discrepancies were and Coca-Cola would not elaborate. The tournament began in September with a series of regional qualifying rounds around the country.”

Maybe giving out 5 points for having every member of the “team” stomp their right foot at the same time had a “disparate impact” on the black teams.

“Zeta Tau Alpha national spokeswoman Christy Barber said the University of Arkansas chapter started stepping 16 years ago and participants were originally mentored by the school’s Alpha Kappa Alpha chapter.”

“Mentored?!?!”  When I was a young child…like 8 years old…I showed my friend how to skip rocks across the water.  “Mentored” isn’t quite the word I would have used.  It calls to mind Richard Hoste’s observation that “banal, everyday acts that are performed by whites become tinged with romanticism in the media when done by blacks.”

So, Coca-Cola sponsors a competition that should be a “gimmee” for blacks…corporate “reparations by another name” you might call it…black teams lose to a white team, suddenly Coca-Cola noticed a scoring “discrepency,” and now a black team is a co-first place winner, and receives the same award.  Would the white team have had their reward increased if they had come in second place?  Of course not.  But hey, Corporate America is a hard-charging bastion of competition, efficiency, and the profit motive.  If Hannity ’12 would only become a reality…then we could let the magic of the market do its thing…[insert Mitt Romney quote consisting of: a noun, a verb, and “innovation”].

Doesn’t Coca-Cola have some kind of responsibility to its shareholders?  Isn’t the money it spends supposed to create value for them?  Is the $200,000+ spent on the “competition” really the best use of their investment.  In theory, sponsoring stupid events like this is supposed to make people want to go out and buy Coke.  “They pay for themselves.”  I’m pretty sure $200,000 spent on advertising or sales promotions probably would have generated a lot more revenue than this did.  Even paying out this money in dividends would have been more ethical than this.

Remember “The First Rule of Diversity in Corporate America”:  “given a choice between diversity (and accompanying bankruptcy) and efficiency, Corporate America will choose bankruptcy every time.”  Keep this in mind as you’re slaving away at your desk in the basement of some large corporation, taking pride in your work ethic.  Your employer wants to displace you just as badly as the Black Panthers do.  This is why we need to start forming our own economic institutions.  At least that way, the fruits of our labor won’t go to support our disposession.  Alex Kurtagic recommends a sort of “white nationalist certification” marking for all products made by the like-minded, similar to the concept of kosher-approval.  I’m not really sure how effective/plausible that would be…do you really think Wal-Mart will stock those products…but it’s better than nothing.  In my humble opinion, a more reasonable start would be some form of drop-shipping internet retailer.  Whites who make different products, like jewelry or childrens toys, can all sell their products on the same site, and one order can be placed for multiple items for convenience.  Then, the site administrator places individual orders with the makers of each requested product, and those “artisans” ship their respective items directly to the customer.  Hey…it’s a start.  Just remember this, as of right now, every dollar that you send up the corporate ladder comes right back down at you with a vengeance in the form of affirmative action, donations to minority organizations, or…well…”stepping” scholarships for blacks.  This disconnect between our elites and the interests of the rest of us reminds me of a recent Steve Sailer post:

It discusses a recent David Brooks article relating the fall of the old Protestant Establishment, and the rise of our new multicultural overlords (read Jews), to the lack of concern that our elites now show for the commoners.  Quote Sailer:

“The unspoken implication of Brooks’ analyses is that American Jews should start thinking of themselves less as oppressed outcasts who need to go for whatever they can get while the getting is good, and start thinking of themselves more realistically as the core of the New American Establishment. Thus, American Jews should realize that, like the Protestant Establishment of yore, their privileged position as a de facto leadership caste bestows upon them corresponding duties to conserve the long-term well-being of the overall nation rather than to indulge in personal and ethnic profit and power maximization.”

I guess that’s one way of looking at it.  Or it could just be an attempt to attribute the hostility that the Jewish elite feels toward its white-gentile subjects to such benign concerns as short-term performance goals.  Maybe Sailer’s (who has definitely done some great work for our side) strategy for combatting Jewish power is that if he just writes enough praising columns about David Brooks, he can finally nudge him and his co-ethnics into actually slightly caring about our well being.  Hey…it beats the approach of some philo-semite “conservatives” who are aware of Jewish power.  This pet-gentile/house-goy approach seems to consist of trying to convince the organized Jewish community that their interests will be better served by an America not entirely void of White influence.  “A White-led U.S. military would do a better job of crushing Israel’s enemies than one led by quota-hires”…”Look at how much cotton I pick massah…Derbyshire do good!” 

Given a choice between:

a) The Sailer approach:  Hope our Jewish elites will take pity on me and use some of the bailout money they received from my taxes to hire me at minimum wage to delete Nigerian General e-mails from the FrumForum.com Inbox, and

b) The Derbyshire approach:  Accept my place in the American caste system as one of Zionism’s international enforcers,

I choose:

c) Divorce myself as much as possible from American institutions, which actively seek to displace me, so that I no longer have an interest in whether or not they collapse.

Fighting Back: Minority Scholarships for Whites

March 2, 2010

Collegescholarships.org has a page about whites applying for “minority” scholarships at historically black colleges.  From “The White Man’s Guide to Getting a Minority Scholarship“:

“Maybe one of the best places to shop for a “minority” scholarship aimed at white males is through one of the public Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). The system of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) was established to provide African Americans with a viable place to secure a rightful college education, at a time when they were afforded the same legal rights to a higher education, but in many instances could find none. Now many HBCUs are scrambling to diversify—they have to, under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which clearly states that any institution that receives federal aid may not discriminate on the basis of race, color, creed or sex. This means that public HBCUs must recruit students from all backgrounds.

If you read up on the minority and Affirmative Action issues, you might assume from various stats and editorial commentaries that white enrollment is on the increase at the HBCUs, but according to The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, this so-called trend is nothing more than hot air. HBCUs remain predominantly black. And even in cases where there are now scholarship incentives for whites, “white students usually opt to go elsewhere.”

A few state’s public HBCU systems have been involved in bitter and lengthy legal battles over the issue of segregation. Various decisions have forced quite a few predominantly black institutions to begin aggressively marketing “minority” scholarships to white students:”

According to the article, among the historically-black public colleges offering these scholarships to whites are:

Tennessee State University, Alabama State University, Alabama A&M University, Jackson State University (Mississippi), Alcorn State University (Mississippi), and Mississippi Valley State University.

The down side…it’s a crappy black school.  On the plus side…it’s free money.  I wouldn’t recommend going to one of these schools just to stick a thumb in the University of Kwanzaa’s eye by taking their money.   If you can afford to go to a better school, then you should definitely do so.  But if it makes the difference between going to school or not going to school…or if for some reason you actually voluntarily go there for non-monetary reasons already…well, I say take the money and run.  Don’t polygamist sects take welfare money based on a belief in “bleeding the beast?”

Two-Tiered Legal System: UC – San Diego Noose

March 1, 2010

A few days ago, a noose was found hanging somewhere on the campus of UC – San Diego.  Police had identified a “suspect”(?) in this “crime”(?), but had refused to release the person’s race.  For the uninitiated, this is almost always a telltale sign that the person responsible for the incident is a minority.  James Edwards, among others, guessed that this noose was put up by a minority…James Edwards, among others, was right.

Via The Political Cesspool:

“[The person who hung the noose] wrote a letter to the school newspaper, which didn’t print her name of course. In it she says she and a friend were just playing around with a piece of rope they found, and the friend made a noose out of it. She thought that was really cool, and all the racial turmoil on campus never crossed her mind. She hung the noose up, and forgot to take it down when she left the library.”

“And if it had turned out to be a white man who confessed, do you think anyone would buy this story? “Wow, what a cool rope trick! Fascinating! I think I’ll just hang it up here because it’s just so neat! And then when I left the library it just somehow slipped my mind! Honest! Gosh, I’m really sorry!”

No, they wouldn’t. He would be in jail, and looking at a year in prison. And everyone knows it.”

He’s right of course.  We’re constantly being told that “hate crimes” laws, such as prohibiting speech or displays like…oh, I don’t know…nooses, are necessary because they “intimidate” minorities, and this “intimidation” is an offense that must be punished.  Making someone uncomfortable…not directly threatening them…is a crime in many jurisdictions of modern America.  But what about when a minority hangs a noose.  Oh, that’s okay…they were just trying to “raise awareness” of racism.  How were they trying to “raise awareness”?…By provoking a feeling of “intimidation” in minority students with the display of a noose.  But their hearts were in the right place, so it’s just fine!  If you go out and kill a child predator in cold blood, to stop him from hurting anyone else, I’m sure the police will let you walk because hey…you meant well.  Displaying a noose to get a reaction from blacks is only a crime if you’re white.  That’s the two-tiered legal system that whites face.  Remember that the next time you’re at some piece of crap Sean Hannity “Freedom Concert” calling the idiot in a Sarah Palin T-shirt next to you a “great American.”  Pretty much all levels of government in the United States hate you, and the sooner you realize that, the easier it will be to attempt to adapt and overcome.  Edwards doesn’t think it was a mistake.  He believes that this was an intentional hoax.  Is he right?  I don’t know, but the good money’s on Yes.  Maybe we should start keeping a record of all confirmed “hate crimes” hoaxes, so we can see what percentage of incidents are fake.  Anybody got a warehouse the size of South Dakota that I can borrow?