Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Exporting Democracy + Importing Diversity = Tyranny

April 20, 2010

Over at The Occidental Observer Blog, Christopher Donovan covers this Military.com article:

DoD Tightens Hate Group Restrictions

Here’s Donovan’s take:

“It’s one thing to realize that universities, the media and the government are largely controlled by those hostile to Whites.  But it’s quite another to realize that even whites’ traditionally core institutions — like the military — have been infiltrated by the same people.  Now comes word that the military is ready to sniff out “white supremacists” — not by tattoo, group affiliation or vocal pronunciations around the barracks, but by nothing more than Internet advocacy.”

Supporters of “hate crimes” laws always like to argue that they’re not criminalizing thought or speech, they’re just enhancing the penalty for certain motivations behind actual criminal acts, kind of like how a premeditated murder is usually punished more harshly than a murder committed in the “heat of passion.”  This is from the Military.com article:

“Thinking of writing a few choice words in an online “white power” chat room? Think again.”…

“A new Defense Department directive on dissident and political activity issued on Nov. 27 — the first since 1996 — says servicemembers “must not actively advocate supremacist doctrine, ideology, or causes.” This includes writing blogs or posting on Web sites.”

So…basically you don’t even have to commit an actual crime in order to be punished by the military justice system, you just have to write non-politically-correct “blogs or postings on Web sites.”…Sounds a lot like criminalizing speech to me.  I’m sure some prominent “civil liberties” organization and its Jewish backers already have a lawsuit in the works. 

Donovan writes:

“ Right there, of course, you’ve got a big problem, and if these men weren’t advancing Israel’s cause, they’d be held in far lower esteem by the Jewish power structure — and during the Vietnam war, they were.  You’d think that if there were a clean-cut, hate-filled White man looking to kill non-Whites, the military would be the perfect place for him.  Seems a military made up of wishy-washy liberals wouldn’t be very effective — they’d throw down their weapons and surrender.)”

Donovan is right of course.  It’s like I wrote earlier:

“Apparently the philo-semite approach to dealing with a hostile Jewish elite, “trying to convince the organized Jewish community that their interests will be better served by an America not entirely void of White [male] influence”…” ‘A White-led U.S. military would do a better job of crushing Israel’s enemies than one led by quota-hires’…”…is no longer even an option.  I guess our elites have decided to make up on quanitity what we lack in quality.  “So what if (now General) Fiorina failed to save (Pat Buchanan’s proverbial) McAllister?”  “Plenty of Scots-Irish kids in Tennessee to take his place.” “

I love how the neocons claim that American troops are fighting in the Middle East for “democracy” and “freedom.”  Ha!…they’ll end up in the brig if they blog that they think Africans have a lower average IQ than Europeans… even if it is backed up by scientific data.  I wonder what would happen if some poor member of the IDF’s Foreign Legion (a.k.a. the U.S. military) got caught with a copy of The Israel Lobby.  He’d probably get “Slovik’d”.  Maybe Hannity would hold a “freedom concert” in his honor.  For some reason I doubt that.  I wonder if comments like this one, recounted by Philip Giraldi, made by the horrible Dr. Lani Kass, will be considered “hate speech” under the new regulations:

“In her speech she explained that Muslims hate western culture and want to dominate the world, adding that because radical Islam has a “culture of death” all those who do not submit to Islam must die, an assertion so absurd that one suspects her political analysis derives from the Free Republic website.”

Probably not…she’s a member of America’s ethnic ruling caste after all.  Besides, she doesn’t actually wear a uniform, so she’s not subject to the military justice system.  Well…she used to wear a uniform…an Israeli one of course.  Filthy goyim bastards and their evil implied accusations of dual-loyalty

Advertisements

Slow News Day!

April 15, 2010

It isn’t currently on top, but earlier today, this was the most prominently displayed story on CNN.com:

“Feds slam Texas factory over discrimination claims”

Dallas, Texas (CNN) — African-American workers at a Texas pipe factory endured a string of racial slurs and harassment and were targeted by their managers when they complained, federal investigators have determined.

Black employees at the Turner Industries plant in Paris, Texas, regularly “were subjected to unwelcome racial slurs, comments and intimidation, racial graffiti, nooses in the workplace and other symbols of discrimination,” the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reported.

Black workers also were denied promotions and disciplined more harshly than whites, the agency concluded in a three-page letter in late March. Managers at the plant not only were aware of a “hostile environment,” they also targeted workers who complained and disciplined white employees who opposed the harassment, the EEOC found.”…

“”We are disappointed that the EEOC has issued this determination and strongly disagree with the EEOC’s findings,” Michael Phelps, Turner Industries’ vice president for human resources, said in a written statement.

Lawyers for the seven Turner employees who went to the EEOC displayed photographs of the slurs, of hanging nooses and threatening notes left for employees at the Paris plant during a news conference Wednesday. One of those employees, Dontrail Mathis, told reporters that he was frequently called racially inflammatory names and that most African-American employees were relegated to the paint shop.”…

“Relegated to the paint shop”…as opposed to…you know…all being Vice Presidents of Finance, where they clearly belonged by virtue of…well…CNN never really says.

“Milligan worked at the plant for nine months before he was fired. Company officials told him he was sacked for failing a drug test, he said. But a lawyer for the employees, Jay Ellwanger, said Milligan warned testers that he was taking a diet medication that could show up as a stimulant.”

Okay…but did he test positive for a stimulant, or did he test positive for some other drug, like heroin, which his medication wouldn’t have caused a false positive for?  Boy CNN really likes to get to the bottom of things…no detail is too small to investigate.

“Paris is about 110 miles northeast of Dallas. The Rev. Peter Johnson, a state civil rights leader, said the problems reported at the Turner plant reflect a “culture of discrimination” that lingers in East Texas.

“East Texas is Mississippi 50 years ago. This case will begin to help us unravel the history of discrimination and bigotry throughout East Texas,” he said.”

Is “Reverend” now the occupational title for “civil rights leaders,” kind of like how “M.D.” designates a Medical Doctor.  “East Texas is Mississippi 50 years ago”?  So East Texas has segregated facilities and a ban on interracial marriage?  To the neocons, everything is Munich 1938.  I guess that, to blacks, everything is Mississippi 1960.  I love the way this “civil rights leader” gets more space on this article than the actual company being accused.  Other than a segment of the written statement, we hear nothing from them.  Did CNN even offer them the chance to respond to these allegations?  Maybe Richard Hoste is right, and CNN really is trying to rebrand itself as the “black news network.”  That should help boost their declining ratings and falling ad revenues.

This was the “front page story”?!?!  In other, apparently less important, news, which I had to dig through CNN.com to find, the ousted Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiev has finally given up on trying to retain his job, and at least 20 people were killed in a terrorist attack in MyanmarI wonder if any of this will even turn out to be true.  I’m sure that when the EEOC is done here, they’ll probably move on to harassing the Census Bureau.  The EEOC is like non-white America’s own personal FBI.

Obama Administration Supports University of Texas Quotas

April 3, 2010

From the Wall Street Journal:

“The Obama administration has asked a federal appeals court to uphold a race-conscious admissions system at the University of Texas at Austin, aiming to stymie a lawsuit that conservatives hope will spur the Supreme Court to limit affirmative action at public colleges.”…

“The University of Texas case was brought in 2008 by two white students who were rejected for admission to the state’s flagship campus. Three-fourths of freshmen gain admission on academic grounds if they rank among the top 10% of their high school’s graduating class. But others are admitted through a “holistic” evaluation in which admission officers, alerted to each applicant’s race by a label on his or her file, may take into account racial or ethnic identity, among other factors.”…

“The white students alleged that the admissions formula violated federal civil-rights law. In August, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks rejected their claim, finding that Texas’s admissions plan was legal because it was based on the Michigan system upheld by the Supreme Court.

The plaintiffs then appealed to the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans; whoever loses there likely will ask the Supreme Court to take up the issue.”…

“Patricia Ohlendorf, vice president for legal affairs at the Austin campus, said many private and public universities take some account of race in admissions. Because blacks and Hispanics on average score lower on entrance exams than white and Asian-American applicants, universities have adopted affirmative-action programs to compensate.

“We think it is critical to being able to achieve the diverse institution that we think is important,” she said.

The Obama administration agrees. “[The] university’s effort to promote diversity is a paramount government objective,” says the brief filed by the Education and Justice departments. The administration disputed claims that Texas was simply engaging in raw racial preferences.”…

So, the Obama Adminstration supports quotas, and is willing to use the Federal Government to support them.  No surprise there.  Not really sure why the federal government is taking a position on college admissions either way, especially if it is not in support of the plaintiffs.  Must be those “evil Democrats” I’m always hearing about…maybe Hannity will take a break from calling for Americans to die in an assault on Gaza to mention this.  Well, before you write that check to the RNC…which Michael Steele will probably end up just spending on a bottle of Cristal…just remember, your badass, Cowboy Hat-wearin’, “terror”-fightin’, scourge of the Middle East “W” was the jackass who helped keep the University of Texas’ anti-white discrimination in place these last few years.  Gotta love that GOP!  So, “diversity is a paramount government objective” is it?  I wonder if the University of Texas will take…dare I say…”affirmative” steps to increase the diversity of the student body in its African-American Studies Department.  Shouldn’t they have to?  I mean, according to them, having a person of a different race on your right and left in class somehow magically transmits knowledge to you by itself.  Maybe they’ll start lowering admissions standards and offering scholarships to convince white kids from Kentucky to leave their trailer parks and become “Partially-Hydrogenated Food Products and the African-American Experience”-majors.  I hear they’ll be offering a PhD track for this in the Fall.  Maybe UT-Austin should change its name to UT-Steele.

Ideology: The Security Blanket of the Man-Child

March 29, 2010

John Tamny has a new article up on Forbes.  It’s entitled “Let Markets, Not Protectionism, Control Immigration.”  If you feel like reading it, go ahead.  If not, I’ll sum it up for you.  Immigration is driven solely by economic concerns (no it is not) and open-borders will result in a self-regulating system where immigrants go to the countries where they will have the highest economic output (again not true) to the benefit of us all (again…this is not true).  I won’t focus on the non-economic factors that encourage immigration, such as escaping political oppression.  Nor will I focus on the fact that uncontrolled immigration, and its accompanying ethnic diversity, will harm, not benefit, me by reducing my quality of life through overcrowding, downward pressure on wages, and fractured community life among other negative impacts.  Instead, I’ll just focus on his asinine belief that immigration to the United States will be driven, and regulated, solely by the ability of an immigrant to increase his/her economic output here…apparently for my benefit.  I’m reminded of this article, by Roger McGrath, in The American Conservative, entitled “The Great Somali Welfare Hunt.”  It discusses the relocation of hundreds of Somali “refugees” to the small town of Lewiston, Maine.  You really should read it for yourself.  It’s informative, well-written, and McGrath has a sharp wit.  Anyway, here are some highlights:

“The latest community to enjoy the delights of Third World mass immigration is Lewiston, Maine, which, since February 2001, has been the destination for hundreds of Somali Muslims.”…

“Lewiston, a former mill town of 36,000 on the Androscoggin River, was virtually all white when the federal census was taken in 2000. Blacks, with 383 people, accounted for 1.1% of the population. No other nonwhite group accounted for more than a fraction of a percent. The exact percentage for whites was recorded as 97.3. With the mills shut down and a less than robust economy, it would seem an unlikely place for Somalis to flock to. Nonetheless, upwards of 2,000 have already done so, and more are on the way.”…

“In 1999, the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) declared the Somali Bantu “refugees,” and the United States agreed to resettle them.”…

“Logic would suggest that these 12,000 black, African Muslims be resettled in their former homeland, the black, African nation of Tanzania, which is more than a third Muslim and borders Kenya, instead of being transported thousands of miles to the United States. But somehow, the UN commissioners and American officials think the good, old U.S.A. is just right for the Somali Bantu—and other Somali refugees as well.”…

“Most of the early arrivals in the United States settled in Clarkston, next-door to Atlanta,”…

“Moreover, Somalis soon learned that welfare benefits and public housing were more generous and better elsewhere, especially in New England. By February 2001, they had discovered Lewiston, and the influx began. The numbers of those arriving accelerated last summer, exceeding 100 a month. Although it is difficult to get an exact fix on the figures, it seems that more than half of all Somalis in Lewiston are on the dole. Welfare spending has more than doubled since their arrival.”…

“Mohammed Maye, the president of the African Community and Refugee Center in Clarkston, has a map of Lewiston on the wall of his office. “Go to Maine,” he advises Somalis. He has recently opened a second office in Lewiston. Abdullahi Abdullahi, the president of the Somali Community Development Organization in Clarkston, tells Somalis that, unlike Georgia, Maine has terribly cold winters, but “the welfare system is better.” Better for sure. Lewiston provides welfare to anyone in need, and the state picks up half the tab. Recipients are allowed a generous five years of assistance before benefits are terminated, and, even at that point, extensions are not difficult to obtain. Single parents can stay on welfare and go to college. Public housing is also available, although, because of the influx of Somalis, there is now a waiting list. More than a third of the apartments at Hillview, Lewiston’s largest public housing project, are occupied by Somalis, many of them single mothers with large broods of children. The fathers are unaccounted for or still in Georgia or Africa. Those who are unable to obtain public housing are eligible for Section 8 vouchers, which the federal government provides to subsidize rental of private housing.”…

“Perhaps the demise of the old industries is of little consequence to the Somalis. When Renee Bernier, the president of the Lewiston city council, offered to hire 30 Somalis at $8 an hour to hold warning signs at road construction sites, few showed any interest. Those who did wanted to work no more than a half-day, 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.”…

“Raymond’s new family practices female genital mutilation, specifically clitorectomy. Termed “female circumcision” by the culturally sensitive and euphemistically inclined, the barbaric practice is common among African Muslims. Not infrequently the clitoris is cut out without the benefit of anesthesia or surgical instruments. Broken bottles or tin can lids occasionally serve as scalpels. This means that often not only is the clitoris cut out but that portions of the labia are also cut away or severely damaged.”…

“The Somali Bantu usually excise the clitoris when girls reach the age of eight or nine. In recent weeks, girls as young as two have undergone the ordeal.”…

““They came in droves off the buses,” said Lewiston council president Bernier, and “some made the welfare office their first stop.” The practice of sahan has become more sophisticated in the United States. The Somalis use the Internet to access the websites of states and towns across the nation, checking crime rates, welfare programs, housing, and schools. Employment opportunities are evidently a low priority. This certainly removes the main obstacle for most of us relocating to dream places. Abdiaziz Ali, the welfare caseworker, is not shy about announcing the Somalis’ intentions. “We can spread out—anywhere we want.””…

“Local sentiment against the anticipated arrival of the Somalis has been so strong that the charities coalition canceled a public presentation and slide show on the plight of the refugees. I suspect the slide show did not include photos of mutilated genitalia.”…

Tamny writes: “when barriers to human migration are put up, productivity is minimized.”  A lot of terms could be applied to Lewiston’s Somalis.  “Hard-workers” and “Go-Getters” aren’t among them.  “Those who did wanted to work no more than a half-day, 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.”  Yep…productivity is booming!  Tamny again:  “At first glance this reveals what has long been obvious: that market forces apply to human flows as much as they do to the flow of goods.” Exactly what “market forces,” those great aggregators of the individual freely-made economic decisions of the masses, decided on moving thousands of Somalis, who didn’t want to work, to Lewiston, Maine, where there were hardly any jobs, where they would be supported by transfer payments that they didn’t earn, provided by neighbors that didn’t want them there and that didn’t want to provide those funds?  We don’t let residents of the United States just keel over and die like we did in prehistoric times, when life was “nasty, brutish, and short.”  If you are in the country, you can absolutely refuse to support yourself in any way, yet your most basic needs will still be met by others.  Public-housing will provide at least some kind of roof over your head, food stamps will keep you from starving, and welfare checks will provide you with the small amount of cash necessary to meet your other essential needs, if they aren’t already covered by other programs.  The quality of life guaranteed to someone in the United States who absolutely refuses to work exceeds the quality of life available to hundreds of millions, if not billions, of foreigners in their own countries regardless of the effort they put forth.  If hiring new employees were banned today, and the borders were opened without regulation tomorrow, millions would still come here for the sole reason that life on the dole here exceeds life with a job in their homeland.  And unless the Department of Health and Human Services and the County Welfare Office are the epitomes of capitalism, “the free market” will have driven none of this.

I agree with “Libertarians” (if the word even has a true definition) that in many cases, if not most, governmental restrictions on the actions of individuals are at best pointless, and at worst harmful.  I said “in many cases,” not “in all cases!”  Are these Somalis really benefiting Lewiston, or the rest of us?  An adult would stop at the suggestion of entirely-open borders, imagine possible outcomes and their likelihoods, and then make a decision based on likely rewards.  That same adult would also look past the false choice of entirely-open or entirely-closed borders, and recognize that you could let some people in, while still keeping out others.  A child, or a Libertarian (or any ideologue for that matter), can’t go behind quoting the related slogan.  The liberals have “Racism Bad/Equality Good.”  The neoconservatives have “Terrorism Bad/Democracy Good.”  Libertarians have “Protectionism and Xenophobia Bad/Open-Borders Good” as their one true path to salvation.  If you knew for a fact that allowing a specific individual to enter this country would result directly in your death, would you still support his immigration?  If you would, then you’re an idiot…and probably a Libertarian too.  This devotion to an abstract principle, regardless of its outcome, rivals even the most ridiculous fanaticism found in any religion.  It’s fascinating to me that the faithful are a constant target of the Beltway-Libertarian-Crowd’s ridicule.  If it is accepted that similar problems can have different solutions, based on the specifics of the particular problem, then it follows that each decision to be made in life requires significant thought and effort, and that wrong decisions are both possible and potentially harmful.  I guess that, for some, the world becomes a scary place when the rules governing its operation don’t fit on the back of an index card.  But I for one would rather not live next door to a man who mutilates his 7-year-old daughter’s genitals …even if it means that John Tamny doesn’t sleep soundly at night.  His mommy will just have to keep checking under his bed for “protectionists” and “xenophobes” before she tucks him in at night. 

I’m constantly told by our Beltway elite that Israel’s well-being is essential to my well being.  Since open-borders would obviously benefit them in the same way that it will benefit us, I wonder if Tamny will advocate a similar policy for our “closest ally.”  For some reason I doubt that Forbes or any other mainstream media source would publish that article.

Sailer vs. Preferential Loans to Minorities

March 25, 2010

Steve Sailer takes on preferences for minorities, this time preferential small business loans for South Asians, again here:

“In 1982, South Asian immigrant businessmen persuaded the Reagan Administration to reclassify Asian Indians from Caucasian to Asian so that they would be eligible for minority business development low-interest loans from the Small Business Administration and for breaks on federal contracting. (Hasidic Jews were given special privileges in 1982, as well.) According to a 2005 report by the Office of the Inspector General of the SBA: “In 1982, SBA designated “Asian Indian Americans” as a socially disadvantaged group.” “

Jews?…getting preferential treatment?…in this country?…Why never in a million years would I have imagined!  Indian immigrants and Jews started getting preferential treatment in 1982…must be that “conservative” Reagan Administration I’m always hearing about.  Apparently they weren’t content with this…as they managed to top themselves by granting amnesty to illegal immigrants a few years later. 

“The 2010 Census will likely reveal that of the 15 specified racial groups on the Census form, “Asian Indians” have the highest average incomes.”

How freaking “socially disadvantaged” can you be if you have the highest average income in the country?  Supporters of these loans say that they are necessary to help overcome “disadvantages” faced by certain groups.  Isn’t having the highest income of any group proof that they face absolutely no disadvantages at all.  You would think that even a slightly competent lawyer could argue for similar loans on behalf of a white client, citing this fact as evidence that these loans are nothing more than unjustified freebies for minorities.  Conservative institutions/lawyers/foundations?…Hello?…Never mind…I’m sure they have more important things on their plates…They’re probably too busy working on appeals for Jonathan Pollard or something.

Institutional Failure: The Limits of “Implicit Whiteness.”

March 20, 2010

Looks like I was right about two things.

 Parodying the mindless support of white Americans for institutions which actively seek to displace them, I wrote:

 U…S…A…U…S…A…U…S…A…What’s that?…You’re not chanting along?…What are you?…Some kind of liberal/commie/terrorist?…Nothing a Sean Hannity “Freedom Concert” (at least I think that’s what they’re called) won’t fix!”

 Well, I was correct…they are called “Freedom Concerts.”  I was also correct in my long-held belief that Sean Hannity is the trash of humanity.

 From James Edwards at The Political Cesspool:

 “Since 2003 Hannity and his scam have raised over $43 million dollars from trusting, good hearted conservatives who want to honor those men and women who have been injured or killed in American uniform. Out of over $43 million dollars, Freedom Alliance has given $1.8 million dollars to the people it claims to be raising all this money for. That’s less than 4% of donations going to help the soldiers. Where’s the rest of it go? According to one source, a whole bunch of it goes to pampering Sean Hannity and his family and friends as they fly to these concerts in private jets, with private limos, and lots and lots of luxury hotel suites.”

 “You’re a great American Sean!”  I wouldn’t be surprised if he charged the widows and orphans of deceased soldiers for admission to these concerts.  “My Dad Died For Israel And All I Got Was This Lousy Hannity T-Shirt!”

 “Implicit whiteness,” the practice, not the theory of (which is entirely accurate), has rapidly gone from slightly pleasing me to disgusting me.  It has reached its functional limits.  White Americans naturally identify with the military.  The problem is that the military no longer serves the ethnic interests of whites.  But pieces of trash like Hannity guilt whites into supporting whatever war for Israel Americans are dying for, the implication being that if you don’t support the war effort, you’re not supporting your fellow white Americans.  So, “implicit whiteness” leads to the blood and treasure of whites being expended in support of the interests of another ethnic group.  Another example is evangelical Christianity, which has been warped by our elites into support for Christian Zionism and adopting black childrenThe problem with “implicit whiteness” is this:  whatever symbolic American institution whites place their faith in will end up being used by other ethnic groups to either support their ethnic interests or to actively oppose the interests of whites, only now they will have the tacit approval of whites in doing so.  Nothing but explicit racialism will work anymore.  “Implicit whiteness” leads nowhere.  It will go nowhere because American institutions no longer serve, and now actively oppose, the interests of white Americans.

 Gradually, I think that more and more on the racial right are starting to wake up to the fact that institutional failure is a reality.  The racial right used to view American institutions as unfair (i.e. “hate crimes” laws) but functional.  It’s no longer just about fairness.  Whites can’t count on American institutions to serve them at all.  I think the saga of this year’s American Renaissance conference opened a lot of eyes.  It wasn’t a matter of the criminal justice system taking a crime against whites less seriously than a comparable crime against minorities…it’s that the criminal justice system basically ignored the crime against whites entirely.  They just refused to protect AmRen.  When a society refuses or is unable to carry out one of its basic functions, defending you against unjustified aggression, it has failed in its main purpose, and you are an idiot if you to continue to voluntarily support it.  “Institutional Failure” is becoming the emerging consensus.

 In this article, the interaction between “implicit whiteness” and institutional failure meshes nicely:

 Writing in The American Conservative, in a very well written article that may be painful for some to come to terms with, John Derbyshire describes the existing national social structure, conspiring against Sam Francis’ fabled “Middle American Radicals,” in the following terms:

 “A ruling class had established itself with aid from [minority] underclass allies to whom it had given promises of provision and protection [paid for by middle and working class whites].”

 Derbyshire, like Francis, is correct.  He goes on to make a prediction about what awaits the most recent manifestation of the MARs/ “implicit whiteness” phenomenon, the “tea parties”:

 “The Tea Partiers will be marginalized by appeals to political correctness, a thing easily done as practically all of them are white. The less committed will drift away; the minority that remain will be folded into the Republican Party, after first being subjected to a brief, painless operation to remove the “R” from “MAR.” Peace will descend, and all will be as it was, the elite secure in its power, the underclass secure with its dole, the middle classes back on the treadmill to pay the bills run up by the elites and their clients.”

 Again, Derbyshire is unfortunately correct.

 Due to mass immigration and declining white birthrates, primary among other factors, the demographic situation for whites has deteriorated to the point where it is probably no longer even possible to effectively defend their group interests at the national political level.  Even if it may still be theoretically possible, which it won’t be for long, it is no longer plausible that it will happen.  As far as a “top-down” movement…just look at our current hostile elite.  It’s dominated by a hostile Jewish elite, and those white gentiles least committed to our interests.  Any attempt to “retake” the elite of American society would be an even steeper uphill struggle than the impossible attempt to “retake” our society on the national political level.  The sad fact of the matter is that American institutions, as they exist today and will for the foreseeable future, no longer serve the interests of whites, and in fact, actively seek to displace them.  This fundamental dynamic will not change.  This seems to be a hard concept for whites, in particular men, over the age of about 45, to come to terms with.  But come to terms with it they must.  The institutions that currently control American life will simply need to be excised from the White community in as much as is possible.  That means dropping out of them and creating our own, smaller, parallel institutions, which may end up serving only the committed few…at least as first.  I’m sure this feels to a lot of older whites like “surrendering” the relatively homogenous America of their childhood, but what they need to understand is that that “America” no longer exists and is not coming back.  This may be painful to accept, but then again many necessary truths are.  With this in mind, two predictions of my own:

 1) If I’m ever fortunate enough to become a multi-billionaire (quick…somebody get me a Goldman Sachs job application), I plan on paying Kevin MacDonald to write books about the various random topics or thoughts that float into, and out of, my head.  I recently purchased both Separation And Its Discontents and A People That Shall Dwell Alone (I would urge everyone to do the same), and have been skimming through them as best as I can manage with the limited time I seem to have available (to be sure though, I AM very lazy).  One of the intriguing things about SAID so far seems to be its explanation of various societal phenomena in history as reactions to the group evolutionary strategy of Judaism.  As I wouldn’t do his work justice, I won’t try to sum it up shortly and sweetly here, but will instead just recommend that you read it yourself.  From what I’ve read so far, one recurring, and interesting, characteristic, noted by MacDonald, of the European reaction to successful Jewish resource competition with the native population, throughout the ages, has been economic collectivism.  For example, one of the reactions of circa 15th century-Spain’s artisan class, to the economic success of the “New Christians” (Jews who had been forcibly converted to Christianity, some of whom remained covert practitioners of Judaism), was to form guilds and trade unions, admittance to which was determined by the Spanish racial purity requirements of the “limpieza” laws (SAID, Chapter 4).  You can’t win the game if you’re not allowed on the field.  As a firm believer in the existence of cycles (for every ebb there is a flow) in nature, I am confident that while our situation will continue to deteriorate…it will only deteriorate so far before it reaches rock bottom.  Eventually, spurred on by their own individual deteriorating economic conditions, whether intended as explicitly racial or not, whites will begin to create their own economic institutions, out of necessity, that will reduce the amount of economic resources that flow from whites to non-whites.  An example that I like to give is the rise of credit unions.  They seem to be springing up all over, and many credit unions are rapidly reducing the criteria required for membership.  It makes sense.  Large banks, led disproportionately by Jews, made bad loans to unqualified black and Hispanic borrowers.  When these loans went south…well, somebody had to pay for the multi-billion dollar bonuses to our Jewish financial elite.  So naturally, the interest rates of hard-working whites, who had continuously made their payments, were raised.  Faced with the prospect of subsidizing underperforming minority loans, and paying for the required profit margin (needed to fund bonuses for Jewish banking executives) of the banks through higher monthly payments, many whites are opting out and joining credit unions, who do not exist for the purpose of turning a profit (funding Jewish bankster bonuses), where they can earn a higher return on savings, and pay a lower interest rate on loans.  The number of non-profit organizations conducting business-like activities will only continue to increase in the foreseeable future.  They will be disproportionately operated by whites and will disproportionately serve whites. Whether they are aware of the racial reasons for their abandoning American institutions and forming their own, or not, white Americans will do so largely individually and unconsciously as a matter of necessity.  The end result will be largely the same as if the motivation had been explicit.

 2) The emerging pro-white movement will find its most enthusiastic and effective supporters in whites who are currently between the ages of around 25-35, and have IQ’s largely in the 110-120 range.  Too many of those older than this age bracket will be unable to accept the necessity of abandoning a large part of the American social infrastructure and territory (later on).  Too many of those younger than this age bracket will have been raised in multicultural America, and view it as “just the way things are.”  Those between 25 and 35 now are probably old enough to remember at least some of the way things used to be, yet young enough to be exposed to the most radical of demographic driven “change,” drawing the unmistakable conclusion that it won’t be undone at a national level.  Those with IQ’s above 120 are more likely to be co-opted by acceptance into the elite.  Those with IQ’s below 110 are more likely to be unable to understand the facts of their dispossession and/or unable to effectively challenge it.  Those in-between will be smart, capable, and have nothing to lose.  When deteriorating economic conditions force a reduction in the budgets for the military and law enforcement, look for support in the growing ranks of unemployed former members of the armed services and police departments.

 I may very well be wrong.  I guess only time will tell.  At least one thing is for certain…no future leaders of the emerging pro-white movement will be found in the ranks of Sean Hannity “Freedom Concert” attendees.  Sean Hannity may indeed be a “great American”…he’s also a piece of shit.  If you accept the fact that “America” is now nothing more than a set of institutions in a given geographic jurisdiction, which seek to actively dispossess whites in that given jurisdiction in order to enrich non-whites in that jurisdiction and abroad, then the two descriptions of Hannity are not contradictory.

Carly Fiorina: Quota-Queen

March 10, 2010

Via Politico:

Apparently Arianna Packard, whose only claim to fame is being “the granddaughter of HP co-founder David Packard,” has written a letter to several Republicans trashing the business performance of California Republican Senatorial candidate Carly Fiorina…whose only claim to fame is nearly running that company into the ground.

From the letter:

““I know a little bit about Carly Fiorina, having watched her almost destroy the company my grandfather founded. So, allow me to disillusion you of a few of your stated reasons for supporting her,” Packard wrote.

 

“Most business commentators consider Fiorina’s tenure at HP to be a disaster,” Packard continued. “The stock price dropped by 50% only to rally 10% on the announcement of her firing. She fired 28,000 people before she herself was fired, departing with the 21 million dollar golden parachute that is financing her campaign.””

Ouch.  What’s amazing isn’t so much her disastrous tenure at HP, which might have been expected, but that after she was fired, she continued to have a career in the business world and that others would ask for her opinion, including the poorly-run McCain campaign, who brought her on board as an economic advisor/spokeswoman.  Her job was to make McCain look good on economic issues, admittedly an almost hopeless task.  Apparently computers and politics aren’t that different, because she failed miserably here too, stating in an interview that “I don’t think John McCain could run a major corporation.”  She’s right of course…but apparently she couldn’t run one either…as evidenced by the fact that she was FIRED!  Made a CEO by political correct corporate types…runs the company into the ground.  Made a political spokeswoman…makes her candidate look bad.  Made the GOP-frontrunner by the Republican establishment…well…I guess we’ll just have to wait to see how that turns out. 

Funny…when I fail at something, there are negative consequences.  Must be that “glass ceiling” I’m always hearing about!

In related news, Vietnam veteran (just kidding!) David Frum seems to think that women should be allowed in combat units (I won’t link directly to the article out of principle.  Frum didn’t write it, but it appears at his site.).  The logic seems to be this:  female IDF soldiers do a good job of harassing unarmed Palestinian farmers, there are substandard male soldiers as well, and some woman rode in a supply convoy without killing everyone around her, so there are now no physical/emotional/psychological differences between the genders, and Sgt. Fiorina (loaded down with gear) will be able to carry her wounded 200 lbs. comrade (also loaded down with gear) to safety just as easily as a 195 lbs. 19 year old young man in his prime could.  I’m sure she’ll have no problem putting on a flak jacket with inserts, a helmet, a pack, a weapon, ammunition, and crew-served weapons gear and hiking 15 miles in the desert either.  At first thought I was upset by this stupid suggestion, but since I’m no longer in the military, the operational efficiency of the IDF’s foreign legion doesn’t matter as much to me any more.  Apparently the philo-semite approach to dealing with a hostile Jewish elite, “trying to convince the organized Jewish community that their interests will be better served by an America not entirely void of White [male] influence”…” ‘A White-led U.S. military would do a better job of crushing Israel’s enemies than one led by quota-hires’…”…is no longer even an option.  I guess our elites have decided to make up on quanitity what we lack in quality.  “So what if (now General) Fiorina failed to save (Pat Buchanan’s proverbial) McAllister?”  “Plenty of Scots-Irish kids in Tennessee to take his place.”  I guess that just leaves my approach:  “Divorce myself as much as possible from American institutions, which actively seek to displace me, so that I no longer have an interest in whether or not they collapse.”

Well, there’s always the Sailer approach (he’s actually unbelievably outstanding on just about everything else):  “Hope that if we just write enough praising columns about David Brooks, we can finally convince him and some of his more radical co-ethnics to actually care more about the life of some Scots-Irish farmboy than about some abstract concept like ‘diversity’.”

I guess anything’s possible…

Africa Got Served!!!

March 4, 2010

Apparently blacks can’t even win a “stepping” competition without affirmative action.  The Council of Conservative Citizens brings us the story:

“A white sorority from Arkansas beat a number of black sororities in a dance competition in Atlanta. The competition was sponsored by Sprite of the Coca-Cola company and the winners were to receive $100k worth of scholarships.

Immediately after the competition black columnists screamed “racism.” Black internet users have posted thousands of messages on YouTube and other websites complaining that whites had won the mostly black competition. Many complained that a white team was even allowed to compete, and demanded that future competitions be “black only.”

Well, screaming and complaining about made up slights pays off apparently. To appease the black community Coca-Cola has retroactively named the second place team as a “co 1st place winner.” The black sorority that came in second had their prize scholarships upgraded to equal the amount given to the white sorority from Arkansas.”

From an Associated Press article in The Washington Post:

“Now a white Arkansas team’s win in an Atlanta step competition has started a fiery debate over the African-inspired tradition and whether the integration of a once-ethnically exclusive activity constitutes a form of cultural theft.”

Wouldn’t a form of…culture…need to be stolen in order to constitute “cultural theft.”  Clapping and stomping your feet to a set rhythm is the underlying concept of most “Barney” DVD’s.  I guess you could compare a purple dinosaur to ancient Greek Philosophy.

“”What has happened is black youth culture, what people would call hip hop, sort of made black culture accessible and appealing to all kinds of people,” said Walter Kimbrough, president of historically black Philander Smith College in Little Rock, Ark., and an expert on black Greek life. “It really now has become an American experience.” “

“An expert on black Greek life?!?!”  They have those?  Has the American quest for knowledge reached such a pinnacle of greatness that we now, after having mastered such basic concepts as addition, and such advanced subjects as quantam physics, have enough time on our hands to devote our studies to the social theories behind the intricate workings of black fraternities and sororities.  Shouldn’t we try to become experts on Chemical Engineering or Pharmaceutical Research instead?

“A YouTube video of their performance, inspired by the movie “The Matrix,” generated hundreds of comments….”Good Job but let the Black folks have their own thing for once!!!” wrote one commenter posting under the name “titetowers” who said the Zeta Tau Alpha [the white sorority]team did well but should not have won.”

I couldn’t agree more “titetowers.”  Why don’t you guys leave fields like, oh…Medicine, Science, and the Law to us…and you can have “stepping” all to yourselves.

“On Thursday, sponsor Coca-Cola announced “scoring discrepancies” and said the runner-up – the Alpha Kappa Alpha [black]team from Indiana University, whose members are black – would share first place and receive the same $100,000 in scholarships that the Zeta Tau Alphas won.

It was unclear what the discrepancies were and Coca-Cola would not elaborate. The tournament began in September with a series of regional qualifying rounds around the country.”

Maybe giving out 5 points for having every member of the “team” stomp their right foot at the same time had a “disparate impact” on the black teams.

“Zeta Tau Alpha national spokeswoman Christy Barber said the University of Arkansas chapter started stepping 16 years ago and participants were originally mentored by the school’s Alpha Kappa Alpha chapter.”

“Mentored?!?!”  When I was a young child…like 8 years old…I showed my friend how to skip rocks across the water.  “Mentored” isn’t quite the word I would have used.  It calls to mind Richard Hoste’s observation that “banal, everyday acts that are performed by whites become tinged with romanticism in the media when done by blacks.”

So, Coca-Cola sponsors a competition that should be a “gimmee” for blacks…corporate “reparations by another name” you might call it…black teams lose to a white team, suddenly Coca-Cola noticed a scoring “discrepency,” and now a black team is a co-first place winner, and receives the same award.  Would the white team have had their reward increased if they had come in second place?  Of course not.  But hey, Corporate America is a hard-charging bastion of competition, efficiency, and the profit motive.  If Hannity ’12 would only become a reality…then we could let the magic of the market do its thing…[insert Mitt Romney quote consisting of: a noun, a verb, and “innovation”].

Doesn’t Coca-Cola have some kind of responsibility to its shareholders?  Isn’t the money it spends supposed to create value for them?  Is the $200,000+ spent on the “competition” really the best use of their investment.  In theory, sponsoring stupid events like this is supposed to make people want to go out and buy Coke.  “They pay for themselves.”  I’m pretty sure $200,000 spent on advertising or sales promotions probably would have generated a lot more revenue than this did.  Even paying out this money in dividends would have been more ethical than this.

Remember “The First Rule of Diversity in Corporate America”:  “given a choice between diversity (and accompanying bankruptcy) and efficiency, Corporate America will choose bankruptcy every time.”  Keep this in mind as you’re slaving away at your desk in the basement of some large corporation, taking pride in your work ethic.  Your employer wants to displace you just as badly as the Black Panthers do.  This is why we need to start forming our own economic institutions.  At least that way, the fruits of our labor won’t go to support our disposession.  Alex Kurtagic recommends a sort of “white nationalist certification” marking for all products made by the like-minded, similar to the concept of kosher-approval.  I’m not really sure how effective/plausible that would be…do you really think Wal-Mart will stock those products…but it’s better than nothing.  In my humble opinion, a more reasonable start would be some form of drop-shipping internet retailer.  Whites who make different products, like jewelry or childrens toys, can all sell their products on the same site, and one order can be placed for multiple items for convenience.  Then, the site administrator places individual orders with the makers of each requested product, and those “artisans” ship their respective items directly to the customer.  Hey…it’s a start.  Just remember this, as of right now, every dollar that you send up the corporate ladder comes right back down at you with a vengeance in the form of affirmative action, donations to minority organizations, or…well…”stepping” scholarships for blacks.  This disconnect between our elites and the interests of the rest of us reminds me of a recent Steve Sailer post:

It discusses a recent David Brooks article relating the fall of the old Protestant Establishment, and the rise of our new multicultural overlords (read Jews), to the lack of concern that our elites now show for the commoners.  Quote Sailer:

“The unspoken implication of Brooks’ analyses is that American Jews should start thinking of themselves less as oppressed outcasts who need to go for whatever they can get while the getting is good, and start thinking of themselves more realistically as the core of the New American Establishment. Thus, American Jews should realize that, like the Protestant Establishment of yore, their privileged position as a de facto leadership caste bestows upon them corresponding duties to conserve the long-term well-being of the overall nation rather than to indulge in personal and ethnic profit and power maximization.”

I guess that’s one way of looking at it.  Or it could just be an attempt to attribute the hostility that the Jewish elite feels toward its white-gentile subjects to such benign concerns as short-term performance goals.  Maybe Sailer’s (who has definitely done some great work for our side) strategy for combatting Jewish power is that if he just writes enough praising columns about David Brooks, he can finally nudge him and his co-ethnics into actually slightly caring about our well being.  Hey…it beats the approach of some philo-semite “conservatives” who are aware of Jewish power.  This pet-gentile/house-goy approach seems to consist of trying to convince the organized Jewish community that their interests will be better served by an America not entirely void of White influence.  “A White-led U.S. military would do a better job of crushing Israel’s enemies than one led by quota-hires”…”Look at how much cotton I pick massah…Derbyshire do good!” 

Given a choice between:

a) The Sailer approach:  Hope our Jewish elites will take pity on me and use some of the bailout money they received from my taxes to hire me at minimum wage to delete Nigerian General e-mails from the FrumForum.com Inbox, and

b) The Derbyshire approach:  Accept my place in the American caste system as one of Zionism’s international enforcers,

I choose:

c) Divorce myself as much as possible from American institutions, which actively seek to displace me, so that I no longer have an interest in whether or not they collapse.

Unrelated: The Blind Leading the High-IQ’d

February 27, 2010

Richard Hoste has a series of interesting posts up at his site.  He believes that white liberals tend to be more intelligent than white conservatives, and that the reason for this is that whites with high IQ’s are more easily taken in (“brainwashed”) by ideologies such as multiculturalism, Marxism, and feminism, than are those with average or below average intelligence.  I think he’s probably right about white liberals having higher IQ’s than white conservatives.  And he does have a pretty good line of reasoning for why this may be.  But if I could add my own two cents, there’s probably another factor that would explain some of this additionally.  That factor is the increased stratification and segregation of our society based on IQ over the last several decades.  Murray and Hernstein famously described the “rise of the cognitive elite” in their amazing book The Bell Curve.  Long story short, their anecdote is something along the lines of:  where once the factory manager lived on the same street, but in a bigger house, than the manufacturing worker that he supervised, they now live in entirely separate neighborhoods, with the manager living in a gated community, and the manufacturing worker living in a working class semi-slum.  Basically, high-IQ people now, unlike in the past, live and socialize predominantly with each other only, likewise for those with average IQ’s, and likewise for those with lower IQ’s.  One of the main reasons that I have never bought into any of the three mentioned ideologies is that I believe my own lying eyes.  I went to a high school with a significant black population.  I’ve been around blacks frequently at work and in life.  There are so many reasons why I will never ascribe to any form of egalitarian thought, the memory of two black girls (taking advantage of the free breakfast program) getting into a fist fight over the last carton of chocolate milk in our high school cafeteria one morning just being among the most prominent.  Just seeing the appearance of group differences with your own eyes leads most to the conclusion that they are real.  As a micro-trend, this wouldn’t explain much.  The factory manager, who used to live next to his lower-IQ neighbors, won’t forget their behaviors when he moves down the road to the gated community.  But as a macro-trend…well…his daughter never lived in the old house…she doesn’t have those memories.  Since IQ is largely heritable, the white high-IQ factory manager’s daughter is likely to be the next generation’s white high-IQ equivalent.  But she didn’t have the same experiences as her father.  To understand the liberalism of today’s average high-IQ white woman in her mid-20’s to mid-30’s, you have to understand where she’s come from.  She grew up in a nice upper-middle-class neighborhood, surrounded by other high-IQ whites and their families.  She doesn’t understand racial differences in criminality because there was no crime or minorities in her neighborhood.  The students at her school were mostly the children of her high-IQ neighbors and had at least above average IQ’s.  She didn’t get much exposure to the few who didn’t fit that profile, as they weren’t in her Advanced Placement classes.  Everyone she grew up with could learn algebra, so if black children in Detroit are failing to learn basic addition…well that’s just a failure on the part of society (read: Whites). With regards to feminism, she doesn’t understand the destruction that fatherlessness has unleashed on the American family.  All of the divorced women she was exposed to (picture The Real Housewives of Wherever) had lives that were just fine.  Of course this is because they could use their Bachelor’s degree in Psychology to get some high five-figure salaried make-work job with the county as a “personal enrichment consultant,” their ex-husbands could afford large alimony checks, and they could pay a nanny to keep an eye on their “exhausting” children.  She never lived next door to a struggling single-mother in a working class neighborhood whose children developed social pathologies.  Men just aren’t really that necessary to family life and successful childhood development in her eyes.  It’s a similar story with economics.  The fundamental concept of Marxism is that everyone can receive resources greater than they value of which they have created.  From the day she is born until she graduates from college with a B.A. in “Creative Expression,” after 6 years of study, at the age of 24, everything has been given to her.  Her every needs were provided for as a child.  As a teenager, every luxury item she desired, from designer clothes to a brand new sports car, was provided by her parents.  They paid for her college.  They paid for an apartment so she wouldn’t have to live in the dorm.  They gave her spending money so that a part-time job wouldn’t interfere with her studies.  The link between effort (and the value that it creates) and wealth, simply does not exist in her mind.  Neoconservatives have famously been referred to as “liberals who were mugged by reality.”  While I think that’s being too charitable to the wildly idealistic (and plainly horrible) neocons, there is a kernel of truth here.  A significant portion of high-IQ twenty-something and thirty-something whites are liberal because IQ-based social stratification and the heritability of intelligence have allowed them to escape the realities of human nature and differences for a significant portion of their lives, most importantly, during their formative years.

A Tale of Two Death Threats/Liars with Low IQ’s

February 26, 2010

By now, I think everyone knows of the ordeal that American Renaissance, a leading publication of race realism, faced while trying to hold their annual conference this year.

Long story short, they made reservations with about 4 different hotels, all of which were subsequently cancelled after each hotel received threats of violence and death.  Local law enforcement in the D.C. metropolitan area, if they even investigated these incidents, didn’t seem to take the matter too seriously.

I wonder what would have happened if these threats had been made against minorities, instead of the much-loathed whites of AmRen.

Fortunately I don’t have to speculate.  Last month a threat was made against black students at Hocking College in Ohio.  Let’s see how it was handled by school and local law enforcement officials.

From an Associated Press article at Cleveland.com:

“An attacker could find many places to hide at Hocking College, a campus carved into a forest in the Appalachian foothills. And with the threat of a mass killing looming over black students at the community college, Allen Edwards is steering clear of the trees.”

Not just any foothills, Appalachian foothills…you know what kind of people we’re talking about.  I think I stopped fearing trees and forests when I was around the age of 7.

“ “I don’t feel too safe walking by the woods,” said Edwards, a 19-year-old black student from Canton. “There’s woods everywhere. And somebody could be out in them, and I don’t know.””

Somebody could also be hiding under your bed Allen…like the boogeyman.

“The FBI is investigating a threat scrawled last week on a bathroom wall warning that black students would be killed Feb. 2. It bore the trademarks of just another casual — though chilling — threat of violence on a college campus, but students here aren’t taking any chances.”

The FBI?  Glad to know we called in the big guns for a case of bathroom graffiti.  I wonder if their Sex Crimes Unit will investigate the “For a good time, call 123-456-7890” message scribbled on the door of the next stall.  If the FBI has the resources available to investigate something this minor, in the face of our trillion dollar deficits, then I think I found a place for some budget cuts.

“At least two black students have withdrawn permanently from school out of fear for their safety, and another dozen have moved out of the dorm where the threat was found”

Really?!?!  Maybe I should drop a Pat Buchanan book in the common area and just clear out the whole building?  If blacks are supposed to fear for their lives from graffiti, then apparently the residents of West Baltimore, East St. Louis, Detroit, etc. never got the memo. 

“The college has provided temporary housing for students who are too scared to stay in Hocking Heights, the dorm where the threats were found. And for those wary of venturing outside until after Feb. 2, teachers are making allowances for missed classwork.”

I don’t even know what to say about that.

“Since the first threat was discovered Friday, the school has installed more security cameras in dorms and beefed up foot patrols. A $5,000 reward is being offered, and extra counselors are on hand…short of stationing police officers in the woods — which Hocking lacks the manpower to do — officials there say vigilance remains the best defense.”

“Short of stationing police officers in the woods”…they seriously considered that?!?!  Security cameras, increased patrols, a $5,000 reward…short of trip wires, continuous Predator drone overflights, and having Force Reconnaissance teams set up ambushes in the woods, what else could they do?

At least the AP has the journalistic integrity to mention the history of fake racial threats at American colleges:

“It’s not the first time racial threats — usually found to be hollow — have interrupted life at a college. Officials at St. Xavier University in Chicago shut down the campus in 2008 when threatening messages were found scrawled in the bathroom of a freshman dorm, and in 2006 a black woman pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct after threatening letters to minorities at her former college led officials to move dozens of students for a night.”

The article also features this little gem…Hocking College quota-fill Amelinda Marengo detailing the horrors of “hate” that she’s experienced at this small school.

“Marengo, who is half Puerto Rican, said she and her black roommate endured racist taunts in the cafeteria on several occasions last year. Her roommate declined to be interviewed.

“We’d be sitting at a lunch table and some guys would be sitting across the room, and they’d be screaming, like, ‘n—– lover’ across the table,” Marengo said. “I had enough of it one day and I got up and I just started yelling at them and telling them, like, ‘There is no reason for you to treat someone like that.'””

Does this sound even remotely plausible?!?!  This incident really occurred…at a modern American University…in this day and age?  I don’t know, maybe it did…but I’ll wait for the proof.  Wonder why the roommate didn’t want to be interviewed about the incident?  But wait…she’s not done…

“About a year ago, Marengo said, a male friend led her into the second-floor men’s bathroom and showed her racist comments on the wall, including a drawing of what she called a “hangman.””

In what context did this incident occur?  What, her and this friend were just sitting around discussing “white male privilege,” and he said “oh, speaking of which, let me show you these racist comments and drawing of a hangman in the men’s bathroom.”?

Getting off topic, I’m reminded of an incident that occurred at a place where I used to work.  The workforce consisted primarily of whites, of both genders, and black women.  For some reason, hardly any black men worked there.  Anyway, one day we had small group meetings discussing diversity (What else?), and the manager leading the discussion asked if anyone had experienced racism in the workplace.  Only one person, a black woman, raised her hand.  When asked by the manager to describe the incident, she explained that a customer had called her by a racial slur over the phone.   The manager then asked her if that was the only incident she had experienced, and she replied that it was.  Then, when the group was asked again to raise their hands if they had experienced racism, a different black woman put hers up.  She told a tale of woe and sorrow about how she was speaking to a white customer, who thought she was white also, on the phone, and he began complaining about black people to her in a very descriptive manner, filled with all kinds of non-politically correct terms for “African-American.”  The manager then asked again if anyone else had experienced a racist incident.  Amazingly, about 8 out of the 10 black women present raised their hands, and absolutely every one of them described a similar incident, where they were mistaken for being a white woman, and a white customer on the phone began describing black people in an unpleasant manner on the phone to them.  This includes the original black hand-raiser who, 5 minutes ago, said that her first described experience was her only one!  I sound unmistakably white (I even have a bit of a drawl sometimes), and out of literally thousands of phone calls from customers, absolutely none began having racial discussions with me.  Most of these black women sounded like…well…black women.  Who calls a company to discuss business and just effortlessly transitions to complaining about minorities?!?!

My own little personal observation about people with low-IQ’s and lying is that when they lie, they tend to:

1)      Lie poorly (Claim events took place that are either easily disprovable, highly implausible, or are clearly in conflict with known facts and details) and,

2)      Lie fantastically (“Remember” minute details of an event that the average person, in a similar situation, would not recall, “Remember” details of events that are so outside of the norm of the events, sensory details, and human behavior experienced by the average person, so as to be immediately conspicuous to the average person).

Think Tawana Brawley, Crystal Gail Mangum, and this one.  Tawana Brawley wasn’t just raped…she was raped by badge-carrying police officers who covered her in dog feces.

If I had been a juror at Harrison Ford’s trial in The Fugitive, I probably would have voted “not guilty.”  A one-armed man?   A doctor can’t be stupid enough to make something like that up.   If I had been a juror at the trial of an inner-city man accused of murder, who gave the same alibi, I probably would have voted “guilty.”  Of course his one-armed man would have had a hook on the end of the prosthetic limb and been 7’2” tall, 230 lbs. of solid muscle, with gold-plated cowboy boots, a belt-fed machine gun, and KKK tattooed on his forehead. 

I bet if you asked 100 doctors, who had murdered their wives and were trying to get away with it, what had happened, probably 99 would either say that she was dead when they got home, or claim to have seen a murderer fleeing after the fact, but not with enough detail to be able to identify him.  If you asked 100 housing project residents… Well…probably 99 would have seen the murder committed, and could list every detail about the murderer (all of them out of the ordinary) down to the brand and size of his shoes…$300 designer leather wingtips in size 17 wide of course.  Most of the details would change every time the story was told…but they would always be jaw-dropping and would usually involve some act of overt racism.

It just goes to show you how pervasive political correctness is in America these days, and how thoroughly the good/perfect/without fault – bad/evil/without redemption dichotomy has infested the thinking of even above-average IQ whites like lawyers, school administrators, and police supervisors.  If a white woman had come to police with the same story as Tawana Brawley, they would have dismissed it immediately.  Likewise, if she had accused black men, instead of white men, of the same offenses, again, police would have dismissed it immediately as ludicrous.  But black is good/perfect, and we all know that whites are evil/capable of anything, so who knows…it’s just crazy enough to be true.

Anyway, back to the two different threats.  Granted, they occurred in different jurisdictions, but it sure sounds like a case of the police offering “disparate” protection to citizens, on racial grounds, to me.  The 14th Amendment guarantees “the equal protection of the laws” by the states.  If white students at Hocking College ever get threatened in the future, and Hocking College doesn’t call out its version of the SWAT team, then I think they should sue.  I don’t know if they would have a case.  Any lawyers out there, please feel free to contact me and let me know.