Archive for March, 2010

Ideology: The Security Blanket of the Man-Child

March 29, 2010

John Tamny has a new article up on Forbes.  It’s entitled “Let Markets, Not Protectionism, Control Immigration.”  If you feel like reading it, go ahead.  If not, I’ll sum it up for you.  Immigration is driven solely by economic concerns (no it is not) and open-borders will result in a self-regulating system where immigrants go to the countries where they will have the highest economic output (again not true) to the benefit of us all (again…this is not true).  I won’t focus on the non-economic factors that encourage immigration, such as escaping political oppression.  Nor will I focus on the fact that uncontrolled immigration, and its accompanying ethnic diversity, will harm, not benefit, me by reducing my quality of life through overcrowding, downward pressure on wages, and fractured community life among other negative impacts.  Instead, I’ll just focus on his asinine belief that immigration to the United States will be driven, and regulated, solely by the ability of an immigrant to increase his/her economic output here…apparently for my benefit.  I’m reminded of this article, by Roger McGrath, in The American Conservative, entitled “The Great Somali Welfare Hunt.”  It discusses the relocation of hundreds of Somali “refugees” to the small town of Lewiston, Maine.  You really should read it for yourself.  It’s informative, well-written, and McGrath has a sharp wit.  Anyway, here are some highlights:

“The latest community to enjoy the delights of Third World mass immigration is Lewiston, Maine, which, since February 2001, has been the destination for hundreds of Somali Muslims.”…

“Lewiston, a former mill town of 36,000 on the Androscoggin River, was virtually all white when the federal census was taken in 2000. Blacks, with 383 people, accounted for 1.1% of the population. No other nonwhite group accounted for more than a fraction of a percent. The exact percentage for whites was recorded as 97.3. With the mills shut down and a less than robust economy, it would seem an unlikely place for Somalis to flock to. Nonetheless, upwards of 2,000 have already done so, and more are on the way.”…

“In 1999, the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) declared the Somali Bantu “refugees,” and the United States agreed to resettle them.”…

“Logic would suggest that these 12,000 black, African Muslims be resettled in their former homeland, the black, African nation of Tanzania, which is more than a third Muslim and borders Kenya, instead of being transported thousands of miles to the United States. But somehow, the UN commissioners and American officials think the good, old U.S.A. is just right for the Somali Bantu—and other Somali refugees as well.”…

“Most of the early arrivals in the United States settled in Clarkston, next-door to Atlanta,”…

“Moreover, Somalis soon learned that welfare benefits and public housing were more generous and better elsewhere, especially in New England. By February 2001, they had discovered Lewiston, and the influx began. The numbers of those arriving accelerated last summer, exceeding 100 a month. Although it is difficult to get an exact fix on the figures, it seems that more than half of all Somalis in Lewiston are on the dole. Welfare spending has more than doubled since their arrival.”…

“Mohammed Maye, the president of the African Community and Refugee Center in Clarkston, has a map of Lewiston on the wall of his office. “Go to Maine,” he advises Somalis. He has recently opened a second office in Lewiston. Abdullahi Abdullahi, the president of the Somali Community Development Organization in Clarkston, tells Somalis that, unlike Georgia, Maine has terribly cold winters, but “the welfare system is better.” Better for sure. Lewiston provides welfare to anyone in need, and the state picks up half the tab. Recipients are allowed a generous five years of assistance before benefits are terminated, and, even at that point, extensions are not difficult to obtain. Single parents can stay on welfare and go to college. Public housing is also available, although, because of the influx of Somalis, there is now a waiting list. More than a third of the apartments at Hillview, Lewiston’s largest public housing project, are occupied by Somalis, many of them single mothers with large broods of children. The fathers are unaccounted for or still in Georgia or Africa. Those who are unable to obtain public housing are eligible for Section 8 vouchers, which the federal government provides to subsidize rental of private housing.”…

“Perhaps the demise of the old industries is of little consequence to the Somalis. When Renee Bernier, the president of the Lewiston city council, offered to hire 30 Somalis at $8 an hour to hold warning signs at road construction sites, few showed any interest. Those who did wanted to work no more than a half-day, 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.”…

“Raymond’s new family practices female genital mutilation, specifically clitorectomy. Termed “female circumcision” by the culturally sensitive and euphemistically inclined, the barbaric practice is common among African Muslims. Not infrequently the clitoris is cut out without the benefit of anesthesia or surgical instruments. Broken bottles or tin can lids occasionally serve as scalpels. This means that often not only is the clitoris cut out but that portions of the labia are also cut away or severely damaged.”…

“The Somali Bantu usually excise the clitoris when girls reach the age of eight or nine. In recent weeks, girls as young as two have undergone the ordeal.”…

““They came in droves off the buses,” said Lewiston council president Bernier, and “some made the welfare office their first stop.” The practice of sahan has become more sophisticated in the United States. The Somalis use the Internet to access the websites of states and towns across the nation, checking crime rates, welfare programs, housing, and schools. Employment opportunities are evidently a low priority. This certainly removes the main obstacle for most of us relocating to dream places. Abdiaziz Ali, the welfare caseworker, is not shy about announcing the Somalis’ intentions. “We can spread out—anywhere we want.””…

“Local sentiment against the anticipated arrival of the Somalis has been so strong that the charities coalition canceled a public presentation and slide show on the plight of the refugees. I suspect the slide show did not include photos of mutilated genitalia.”…

Tamny writes: “when barriers to human migration are put up, productivity is minimized.”  A lot of terms could be applied to Lewiston’s Somalis.  “Hard-workers” and “Go-Getters” aren’t among them.  “Those who did wanted to work no more than a half-day, 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.”  Yep…productivity is booming!  Tamny again:  “At first glance this reveals what has long been obvious: that market forces apply to human flows as much as they do to the flow of goods.” Exactly what “market forces,” those great aggregators of the individual freely-made economic decisions of the masses, decided on moving thousands of Somalis, who didn’t want to work, to Lewiston, Maine, where there were hardly any jobs, where they would be supported by transfer payments that they didn’t earn, provided by neighbors that didn’t want them there and that didn’t want to provide those funds?  We don’t let residents of the United States just keel over and die like we did in prehistoric times, when life was “nasty, brutish, and short.”  If you are in the country, you can absolutely refuse to support yourself in any way, yet your most basic needs will still be met by others.  Public-housing will provide at least some kind of roof over your head, food stamps will keep you from starving, and welfare checks will provide you with the small amount of cash necessary to meet your other essential needs, if they aren’t already covered by other programs.  The quality of life guaranteed to someone in the United States who absolutely refuses to work exceeds the quality of life available to hundreds of millions, if not billions, of foreigners in their own countries regardless of the effort they put forth.  If hiring new employees were banned today, and the borders were opened without regulation tomorrow, millions would still come here for the sole reason that life on the dole here exceeds life with a job in their homeland.  And unless the Department of Health and Human Services and the County Welfare Office are the epitomes of capitalism, “the free market” will have driven none of this.

I agree with “Libertarians” (if the word even has a true definition) that in many cases, if not most, governmental restrictions on the actions of individuals are at best pointless, and at worst harmful.  I said “in many cases,” not “in all cases!”  Are these Somalis really benefiting Lewiston, or the rest of us?  An adult would stop at the suggestion of entirely-open borders, imagine possible outcomes and their likelihoods, and then make a decision based on likely rewards.  That same adult would also look past the false choice of entirely-open or entirely-closed borders, and recognize that you could let some people in, while still keeping out others.  A child, or a Libertarian (or any ideologue for that matter), can’t go behind quoting the related slogan.  The liberals have “Racism Bad/Equality Good.”  The neoconservatives have “Terrorism Bad/Democracy Good.”  Libertarians have “Protectionism and Xenophobia Bad/Open-Borders Good” as their one true path to salvation.  If you knew for a fact that allowing a specific individual to enter this country would result directly in your death, would you still support his immigration?  If you would, then you’re an idiot…and probably a Libertarian too.  This devotion to an abstract principle, regardless of its outcome, rivals even the most ridiculous fanaticism found in any religion.  It’s fascinating to me that the faithful are a constant target of the Beltway-Libertarian-Crowd’s ridicule.  If it is accepted that similar problems can have different solutions, based on the specifics of the particular problem, then it follows that each decision to be made in life requires significant thought and effort, and that wrong decisions are both possible and potentially harmful.  I guess that, for some, the world becomes a scary place when the rules governing its operation don’t fit on the back of an index card.  But I for one would rather not live next door to a man who mutilates his 7-year-old daughter’s genitals …even if it means that John Tamny doesn’t sleep soundly at night.  His mommy will just have to keep checking under his bed for “protectionists” and “xenophobes” before she tucks him in at night. 

I’m constantly told by our Beltway elite that Israel’s well-being is essential to my well being.  Since open-borders would obviously benefit them in the same way that it will benefit us, I wonder if Tamny will advocate a similar policy for our “closest ally.”  For some reason I doubt that Forbes or any other mainstream media source would publish that article.


AmRen is on the case!

March 25, 2010

I’ve been busy these past few days, so posting has been slow.  Fortunately, the good folks at American Renaissance must never sleep, as they’ve been on the ball, as always, and found several news stories lately that deal with quotas/disparate justice for whites/etc.

I’ll begin on a positive note.  AmRen reports on this story, from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, of wrongfully-dismissed whites fighting back against the black-dominated DeKalb County Government in Georgia.  Good to see more whites fighting back.:

“Testimony is to start Tuesday in a federal trial in which plaintiffs contend former DeKalb County CEO Vernon Jones ordered a top subordinate to “dig up dirt” on top white managers because he wanted a “darker administration” to reflect the county’s racial makeup.

Lead plaintiff lawyer Michael Bowers told jurors in opening statements Monday in U.S. District Court in Atlanta that three top managers in the county’s parks department were humiliated, harassed and forced out of their jobs because of their race, and an African-American, who was once a close friend of Jones’, was fired because he wouldn’t carry out the orders.”…

“Becky Kelley, who was director of DeKalb’s parks department for nearly a decade, Michael Bryant, who was the deputy director for the parks department, and John Drake, another former deputy director of the parks department, filed a suit in 2004, contending that they suffered job discrimination because they are white. Herbert Lowe, a black deputy director in the department, contends he was fired because he wouldn’t cooperate with the program to target white managers for removal.”


Next comes the bad news.  Apparently this new healthcare bill is loaded with quotas.  Reporting on an article written by La Shawn Barber on Michelle Malkin’s website:

“One provision states that programs with “a record of training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or from a rural or disadvantaged background” will be given priority for government money. This is only one of several such provisions. Programs and medical institutions that practice racial preferences will be moved further up the money queue than programs and medical institutions that disregard race.”…

“The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights called the provisions racially discriminatory and sent President Barack Obama and Congress letters warning them about the provisions. The politicians ignored the warning, naturally.”…

“The Commission rightly concluded that medical institutions competing for federal dollars may end up lowering academic standards for minority applicants, and added that “race-based attempts to achieve some ill-defined ‘critical mass’ of minority students or to demonstrate a ‘sufficient’ record of training such students are constitutionally suspect. . . .”

Apparently competency takes a back seat to proportional representation as far as the makeup of America’s doctors goes.  The new slogan for this healthcare bill should be “Give Me Quotas And Give Me Death!”  Patrick Henry would be proud.  Here’s a copy of the letter from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

James Edwards at The Political Cesspool reports that Muslims may be exempt from ObamaCare.  If this is true, then it just confirms what many have long suspected…that this “healthcare” bill is nothing more than a giant transfer of wealth and resources from whites (who are less likely to be Muslim) to non-whites (who are more likely to be Muslim). 

As I always like to end on a high-note, here’s some more good news.  From the Associated Press/Google News, by way of Amren:

“The school board in North Carolina’s capital city narrowly agreed Tuesday to roll back a policy that buses students to achieve diversity, following a tense meeting at which three people were arrested, others were forcibly removed and heated arguments echoed passions from an era past.”

“After dozens spoke at a hearing, the Wake County school board voted 5-4 to approve a new assignment policy aimed at placing students in schools near their homes.”…

“The NAACP supported the long-standing policy that uses socio-economic background rather than race to assign students, and Barber continued to question the board’s plans during Tuesday’s meeting.”

Yeah…somewhere in the Constitution, it guarantees black people the right to force white kids to drive an hour and a half away from home each way to go to school with them.

Sailer vs. Preferential Loans to Minorities

March 25, 2010

Steve Sailer takes on preferences for minorities, this time preferential small business loans for South Asians, again here:

“In 1982, South Asian immigrant businessmen persuaded the Reagan Administration to reclassify Asian Indians from Caucasian to Asian so that they would be eligible for minority business development low-interest loans from the Small Business Administration and for breaks on federal contracting. (Hasidic Jews were given special privileges in 1982, as well.) According to a 2005 report by the Office of the Inspector General of the SBA: “In 1982, SBA designated “Asian Indian Americans” as a socially disadvantaged group.” “

Jews?…getting preferential treatment?…in this country?…Why never in a million years would I have imagined!  Indian immigrants and Jews started getting preferential treatment in 1982…must be that “conservative” Reagan Administration I’m always hearing about.  Apparently they weren’t content with this…as they managed to top themselves by granting amnesty to illegal immigrants a few years later. 

“The 2010 Census will likely reveal that of the 15 specified racial groups on the Census form, “Asian Indians” have the highest average incomes.”

How freaking “socially disadvantaged” can you be if you have the highest average income in the country?  Supporters of these loans say that they are necessary to help overcome “disadvantages” faced by certain groups.  Isn’t having the highest income of any group proof that they face absolutely no disadvantages at all.  You would think that even a slightly competent lawyer could argue for similar loans on behalf of a white client, citing this fact as evidence that these loans are nothing more than unjustified freebies for minorities.  Conservative institutions/lawyers/foundations?…Hello?…Never mind…I’m sure they have more important things on their plates…They’re probably too busy working on appeals for Jonathan Pollard or something.

June Cleaver Doesn’t Live Here Anymore.

March 24, 2010

I’m currently in the process of reading Taken into Custody:  The War Against Fathers, Marriage, and the Family by Stephen Baskerville.  It really is an amazing indictment of the two-tiered legal system that men face when confronted with divorce and the loss of custody of their children.  As the whole book is full of horrific examples of what men face, I’ll just quote this one segment, referenced by Baskerville (p.79), of an article that appeared in the Observer:

“One applicant had cancer which …’could be upsetting’ for his child.  A man might be said to ‘lack sensitivity’ or be ‘over-enthusiastic’ or even ‘father-centered’ – for which tendency one man was denied all contact with his child.  In one case, it was noted disapprovingly that a father had told his son he preferred Scrabble to Monopoly and thought hyacinths smelled sweeter than roses.  This was seen as ‘taking the lead in contact’ – a form of emotional abuse, according to the reporting officer.  One father wore a black shirt, which ‘could be intimidating.’  Another stood accused of ‘losing his temper with customs officials in a French airport’ … and was therefore said to have an ‘unfortunate disposition.’  One report could find no reason why a child should not see more of his father but went on to conclude:  ‘Nonetheless, the mother must be concerned about something.’  The father’s contact was limited to two hours every six weeks.”

I just chose this segment to quote because it offers several examples within a few sentences…and I’m very lazy.  Denying visitation rights for the reasons listed above is not the worst of it.  There are some absolute horror stories, and I’m not even a third of the way through the book.  I’m just too lazy to go back through the pages I’ve read and pick them out.  The trampling of constitutional rights, judicial abuse, discrimination in favor of the wife/mother, arbitrary imprisonment, and Kafkaesque administrative procedures are the norm.  You really should read this book.  It’s like electro-shock therapy for those of you men out there still laboring under the delusion that you’ll get a fair shake in the American legal system.  If you can’t afford the book, or just don’t have time to read it, here are two good articles by the author, on the same topic:

Fathers Into Felons

The Fathers’ War


What’s amazing is the completely and totally hateful way in which these women, who are overwhelmingly the ones filing for no-fault divorce, treat their husbands, who in most cases have done nothing wrong.  They falsely accuse them of the worst things imaginable, and completely deny them the right to visit their children either out of spite or “just because they can.”  Welfare is widely acknowledged as one of the key factors causing the destruction of the black family beginning in the 1960’s.  America’s “child-support enforcement” regime is probably THE key factor in the post-60’s destruction of the white family.  Prior to welfare, a father was necessary for the mother and her child to have around at the very least due to the financial resources he provided.  Once welfare filled that role, he was superfluous, and single-motherhood among blacks soared.  It increased for whites as well, but at a much lesser rate.  The main reason for that is simply that welfare use is socially stigmatized among whites.  “Child support payments” collected from “deadbeat dads” (the widespread existence of which Baskerville proves is a myth) is not.  Women turned on their men in a heartbeat.  In most cases, yes…you really are nothing more than a wallet to her.  Yet another difficult truth white males will need to…yet will probably refuse to accept.  June Cleaver doesn’t live here anymore.

This appears a little later on (p.81):

“A 1997 ruling of the Massachusetts Supreme Court prohibiting a father from taking his children to Christian services received some media attention but no opposition from either churches or civil libertarians.  In Arlington, Virginia, a judge’s 1997 injunction prohibiting a father from taking his son to Bar Mitzvah was reversed only after a protest in front of the county courthouse.”

So…a Christian father is denied the right to take his child to religious services, he complains, but to no avail…a Jewish father is denied the right to take his child to religious services, and all of a sudden it’s an injustice to be remedied .  At least a dozen words could describe what popped into my mind when I first read that.  “Shocked” definitely isn’t one of them.  This is why Jews can continue to support social and political movements designed to weaken family structures.  Because when it comes time to actually implement these “universal” laws to specific individuals and their cases, Jewish fathers can count on Amy Totenberg, or any of the large number of Jews that dominate American institutions, to uphold at least some of their parental rights, while simultaneously denying those rights to white gentile fathers.  Our Hebrew Overlords will always be taken care of in the end.

Institutional Failure: The Limits of “Implicit Whiteness.”

March 20, 2010

Looks like I was right about two things.

 Parodying the mindless support of white Americans for institutions which actively seek to displace them, I wrote:

 U…S…A…U…S…A…U…S…A…What’s that?…You’re not chanting along?…What are you?…Some kind of liberal/commie/terrorist?…Nothing a Sean Hannity “Freedom Concert” (at least I think that’s what they’re called) won’t fix!”

 Well, I was correct…they are called “Freedom Concerts.”  I was also correct in my long-held belief that Sean Hannity is the trash of humanity.

 From James Edwards at The Political Cesspool:

 “Since 2003 Hannity and his scam have raised over $43 million dollars from trusting, good hearted conservatives who want to honor those men and women who have been injured or killed in American uniform. Out of over $43 million dollars, Freedom Alliance has given $1.8 million dollars to the people it claims to be raising all this money for. That’s less than 4% of donations going to help the soldiers. Where’s the rest of it go? According to one source, a whole bunch of it goes to pampering Sean Hannity and his family and friends as they fly to these concerts in private jets, with private limos, and lots and lots of luxury hotel suites.”

 “You’re a great American Sean!”  I wouldn’t be surprised if he charged the widows and orphans of deceased soldiers for admission to these concerts.  “My Dad Died For Israel And All I Got Was This Lousy Hannity T-Shirt!”

 “Implicit whiteness,” the practice, not the theory of (which is entirely accurate), has rapidly gone from slightly pleasing me to disgusting me.  It has reached its functional limits.  White Americans naturally identify with the military.  The problem is that the military no longer serves the ethnic interests of whites.  But pieces of trash like Hannity guilt whites into supporting whatever war for Israel Americans are dying for, the implication being that if you don’t support the war effort, you’re not supporting your fellow white Americans.  So, “implicit whiteness” leads to the blood and treasure of whites being expended in support of the interests of another ethnic group.  Another example is evangelical Christianity, which has been warped by our elites into support for Christian Zionism and adopting black childrenThe problem with “implicit whiteness” is this:  whatever symbolic American institution whites place their faith in will end up being used by other ethnic groups to either support their ethnic interests or to actively oppose the interests of whites, only now they will have the tacit approval of whites in doing so.  Nothing but explicit racialism will work anymore.  “Implicit whiteness” leads nowhere.  It will go nowhere because American institutions no longer serve, and now actively oppose, the interests of white Americans.

 Gradually, I think that more and more on the racial right are starting to wake up to the fact that institutional failure is a reality.  The racial right used to view American institutions as unfair (i.e. “hate crimes” laws) but functional.  It’s no longer just about fairness.  Whites can’t count on American institutions to serve them at all.  I think the saga of this year’s American Renaissance conference opened a lot of eyes.  It wasn’t a matter of the criminal justice system taking a crime against whites less seriously than a comparable crime against minorities…it’s that the criminal justice system basically ignored the crime against whites entirely.  They just refused to protect AmRen.  When a society refuses or is unable to carry out one of its basic functions, defending you against unjustified aggression, it has failed in its main purpose, and you are an idiot if you to continue to voluntarily support it.  “Institutional Failure” is becoming the emerging consensus.

 In this article, the interaction between “implicit whiteness” and institutional failure meshes nicely:

 Writing in The American Conservative, in a very well written article that may be painful for some to come to terms with, John Derbyshire describes the existing national social structure, conspiring against Sam Francis’ fabled “Middle American Radicals,” in the following terms:

 “A ruling class had established itself with aid from [minority] underclass allies to whom it had given promises of provision and protection [paid for by middle and working class whites].”

 Derbyshire, like Francis, is correct.  He goes on to make a prediction about what awaits the most recent manifestation of the MARs/ “implicit whiteness” phenomenon, the “tea parties”:

 “The Tea Partiers will be marginalized by appeals to political correctness, a thing easily done as practically all of them are white. The less committed will drift away; the minority that remain will be folded into the Republican Party, after first being subjected to a brief, painless operation to remove the “R” from “MAR.” Peace will descend, and all will be as it was, the elite secure in its power, the underclass secure with its dole, the middle classes back on the treadmill to pay the bills run up by the elites and their clients.”

 Again, Derbyshire is unfortunately correct.

 Due to mass immigration and declining white birthrates, primary among other factors, the demographic situation for whites has deteriorated to the point where it is probably no longer even possible to effectively defend their group interests at the national political level.  Even if it may still be theoretically possible, which it won’t be for long, it is no longer plausible that it will happen.  As far as a “top-down” movement…just look at our current hostile elite.  It’s dominated by a hostile Jewish elite, and those white gentiles least committed to our interests.  Any attempt to “retake” the elite of American society would be an even steeper uphill struggle than the impossible attempt to “retake” our society on the national political level.  The sad fact of the matter is that American institutions, as they exist today and will for the foreseeable future, no longer serve the interests of whites, and in fact, actively seek to displace them.  This fundamental dynamic will not change.  This seems to be a hard concept for whites, in particular men, over the age of about 45, to come to terms with.  But come to terms with it they must.  The institutions that currently control American life will simply need to be excised from the White community in as much as is possible.  That means dropping out of them and creating our own, smaller, parallel institutions, which may end up serving only the committed few…at least as first.  I’m sure this feels to a lot of older whites like “surrendering” the relatively homogenous America of their childhood, but what they need to understand is that that “America” no longer exists and is not coming back.  This may be painful to accept, but then again many necessary truths are.  With this in mind, two predictions of my own:

 1) If I’m ever fortunate enough to become a multi-billionaire (quick…somebody get me a Goldman Sachs job application), I plan on paying Kevin MacDonald to write books about the various random topics or thoughts that float into, and out of, my head.  I recently purchased both Separation And Its Discontents and A People That Shall Dwell Alone (I would urge everyone to do the same), and have been skimming through them as best as I can manage with the limited time I seem to have available (to be sure though, I AM very lazy).  One of the intriguing things about SAID so far seems to be its explanation of various societal phenomena in history as reactions to the group evolutionary strategy of Judaism.  As I wouldn’t do his work justice, I won’t try to sum it up shortly and sweetly here, but will instead just recommend that you read it yourself.  From what I’ve read so far, one recurring, and interesting, characteristic, noted by MacDonald, of the European reaction to successful Jewish resource competition with the native population, throughout the ages, has been economic collectivism.  For example, one of the reactions of circa 15th century-Spain’s artisan class, to the economic success of the “New Christians” (Jews who had been forcibly converted to Christianity, some of whom remained covert practitioners of Judaism), was to form guilds and trade unions, admittance to which was determined by the Spanish racial purity requirements of the “limpieza” laws (SAID, Chapter 4).  You can’t win the game if you’re not allowed on the field.  As a firm believer in the existence of cycles (for every ebb there is a flow) in nature, I am confident that while our situation will continue to deteriorate…it will only deteriorate so far before it reaches rock bottom.  Eventually, spurred on by their own individual deteriorating economic conditions, whether intended as explicitly racial or not, whites will begin to create their own economic institutions, out of necessity, that will reduce the amount of economic resources that flow from whites to non-whites.  An example that I like to give is the rise of credit unions.  They seem to be springing up all over, and many credit unions are rapidly reducing the criteria required for membership.  It makes sense.  Large banks, led disproportionately by Jews, made bad loans to unqualified black and Hispanic borrowers.  When these loans went south…well, somebody had to pay for the multi-billion dollar bonuses to our Jewish financial elite.  So naturally, the interest rates of hard-working whites, who had continuously made their payments, were raised.  Faced with the prospect of subsidizing underperforming minority loans, and paying for the required profit margin (needed to fund bonuses for Jewish banking executives) of the banks through higher monthly payments, many whites are opting out and joining credit unions, who do not exist for the purpose of turning a profit (funding Jewish bankster bonuses), where they can earn a higher return on savings, and pay a lower interest rate on loans.  The number of non-profit organizations conducting business-like activities will only continue to increase in the foreseeable future.  They will be disproportionately operated by whites and will disproportionately serve whites. Whether they are aware of the racial reasons for their abandoning American institutions and forming their own, or not, white Americans will do so largely individually and unconsciously as a matter of necessity.  The end result will be largely the same as if the motivation had been explicit.

 2) The emerging pro-white movement will find its most enthusiastic and effective supporters in whites who are currently between the ages of around 25-35, and have IQ’s largely in the 110-120 range.  Too many of those older than this age bracket will be unable to accept the necessity of abandoning a large part of the American social infrastructure and territory (later on).  Too many of those younger than this age bracket will have been raised in multicultural America, and view it as “just the way things are.”  Those between 25 and 35 now are probably old enough to remember at least some of the way things used to be, yet young enough to be exposed to the most radical of demographic driven “change,” drawing the unmistakable conclusion that it won’t be undone at a national level.  Those with IQ’s above 120 are more likely to be co-opted by acceptance into the elite.  Those with IQ’s below 110 are more likely to be unable to understand the facts of their dispossession and/or unable to effectively challenge it.  Those in-between will be smart, capable, and have nothing to lose.  When deteriorating economic conditions force a reduction in the budgets for the military and law enforcement, look for support in the growing ranks of unemployed former members of the armed services and police departments.

 I may very well be wrong.  I guess only time will tell.  At least one thing is for certain…no future leaders of the emerging pro-white movement will be found in the ranks of Sean Hannity “Freedom Concert” attendees.  Sean Hannity may indeed be a “great American”…he’s also a piece of shit.  If you accept the fact that “America” is now nothing more than a set of institutions in a given geographic jurisdiction, which seek to actively dispossess whites in that given jurisdiction in order to enrich non-whites in that jurisdiction and abroad, then the two descriptions of Hannity are not contradictory.

Hate Crimes in Virginia: Don’t Look Too Closely.

March 20, 2010

So, I’ve been looking into “hate crimes” laws in various states.  Here’s one from Virginia.    § 52-8.5. Reporting hate crimes.:

Ҥ 52-8.5. Reporting hate crimes.

A. The Superintendent shall establish and maintain within the Department of State Police a central repository for the collection and analysis of information regarding hate crimes and groups and individuals carrying out such acts.

B. State, county and municipal law-enforcement agencies shall report to the Department all hate crimes occurring in their jurisdictions in a form, time and manner prescribed by the Superintendent. Such reports shall not be open to public inspection except insofar as the Superintendent shall permit.

C. For purposes of this section, “hate crime” means (i) a criminal act committed against a person or his property with the specific intent of instilling fear or intimidation in the individual against whom the act is perpetrated because of race, religion or ethnic origin or that is committed for the purpose of restraining that person from exercising his rights under the Constitution or laws of this Commonwealth or of the United States, (ii) any illegal act directed against any persons or their property because of those persons’ race, religion or national origin, and (iii) all other incidents, as determined by law-enforcement authorities, intended to intimidate or harass any individual or group because of race, religion or national origin.

(1988, c. 838; 2002, cc. 588, 623.)”

So basically, local and state agencies are required to report all “hate crimes,” and the State Police is required to keep a database of these incidents.  I noticed this passage, in Section B:  “Such reports shall not be open to public inspection except insofar as the Superintendent shall permit.”  Why not?  At least minor details of most criminal offenses are available under Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act.  So, why not make this centralized database available, obviously excluding such things as identifiable information about the victims?  If I had to guess, it’s probably because the racial makeup of all offenders of all reported “hate crimes” incidents (probably not overwhelmingly white) probably doesn’t mirror the racial makeup of those actually charged with hate crimes (probably overwhelmingly white).  “except insofar as the Superintendent shall permit”…Yeah…I’m sure the Superintendent will allow an open, honest, and easily conducted detailed comparison of “hate crimes” committed, and “hate crimes” actually charged.  That’ll probably happen around the same time that David Frum, whose existence is the best evidence I’ve seen yet to refute Kevin MacDonald’s theory that Judaism encourages eugenic practices for its followers, embraces the two-state solution for Palestine.

Justice in “The Mistake by the Lake!”

March 19, 2010

Cleveland that is!  From, by way of James Edwards at The Political Cesspool:

“CLEVELAND, Ohio — A former Bedford Heights city employee who claimed she was discriminated against by Mayor Fletcher Berger and others because of her race and disability was awarded $1.83 million in pay and damages by a federal jury on Monday.”…

In the 20 months after Berger took office, 38 of the 41 workers the city hired in its community life department, which includes the recreation center, were African-American, Hinners said.”

Wow…a jury agreed to that?   I wonder where the actual trial was held.  I know there’s no way in hell they found one of those inherently evil “all white jury” ‘s in a rat-hole like Cleveland.  I know there are some misguided whites out there who still think that it’s “dishonorable” for them to file discrimination lawsuits…I used to be one of them myself.  But it’s not about “being better” than minorities, it’s about competing with them for survival in a system rigged to ensure your displacement.  Yes, there is something inherently dishonorable about bringing brass knuckles to a fair boxing match with an impartial referee, and a well-intentioned and unarmed opponent.  But there is absolutely nothing wrong with bringing a baseball bat to a ring in an empty arena where your opponent has a baseball bat, and the ref wants you dead, even if they still call it a “boxing match.”  You’re not “cheating” by filing reverse discrimination lawsuits because it’s not a fair contest to begin with.  Bringing a knife to a gunfight doesn’t make you brave…just stupid.  James Edwards’ thoughts:  “Better cash in while you can, white folks.” 

My thoughts:

“File a complaint…what do you have to lose?…pride?…you think being on unemployment won’t take that away from you anyway?  Perhaps the main complaint is that men don’t want to feel like “whiners” by saying they were discriminated against, but just remember, minorities and women do this all the time.  Not doing the same thing in return doesn’t make you better than them when the result is losing your livelihood.  Somebody who willingly agrees to bring only a knife to a gunfight isn’t brave…they’re stupid.  Even if you can’t prove that you were chosen to be laid-off because you are white and/or male…who cares…file anyway.  Clog the system with so many complaints that it overloads!  Even if your claim is found to be unsupported, the 5 seconds that it takes under-qualified and over-paid EEOC government employee Shaniqua to sigh in disgust, crumble it up, and throw it away, is 5 seconds that she now won’t have available to harass an honest white employer facing a bogus discrimination lawsuit.  File! Baby! File!”

$1.83 million…looks like Cleveland won’t be getting that new “Hate Crimes Unit” for its Police Department or “Museum of Tolerance” after all.  Who am I kidding…they’ll still get them.  It’s just that now, whites in Kansas and Montana will pay for them in the form of a federal grant. 

“38 of the 41 workers the city hired in its community life department, which includes the recreation center, were African-American”…If you eliminated every government job, every job in “Human Resources,” and every job with the words “community” or “diversity” in the title, the unemployment rate for black women would be like 98%.

“Conservatives” will be okay with “zero tolerance” this time around.

March 15, 2010

A favorite pastime of the Fox News/beltway conservative crowd is bashing the “zero tolerance” policies regarding “violence” at schools.  Examples of boyscouts being suspended for bringing dangerous safety-pins to school are held up for ridicule…and rightly so.  But a new “zero-tolerance” wind is blowing in from the east (Washington D.C. or Africa…take your pick), and this one will apply only to white students.

From the Wall Street Journal, by way of The Council of Conservative Citizens:

“The Obama administration plans to crack down on civil-rights infractions in school districts and university systems, including alleged disparities in the disciplining of white and black students.

The campaign will essentially put an enforcement stick behind the carrot of the administration’s $4.35 billion Race to the Top program, which holds out the promise of extra federal funding if states revamp their education policies. While Race to the Top will reward school reforms, the civil-rights push will emphasize the potential to punish offending schools.

States found to be violating laws designed to assure equal treatment in education could, in extreme cases, face litigation or a withholding of federal school funding, U.S. education officials said. They portrayed the move as an effort to make up for years of lax enforcement under the previous administration.”

Noting that “currently blacks students on average are three times more likely to be suspended,” the CofCC sums it up nicely:

School administrators are already in fear of punishing black students, and it is getting worse every day. Yet Obama wants to make it worse. Obama’s program calls for punishments and litigation against schools who don’t improve the imbalance in suspension rates between the races. This means that schools will have to suspend whites for doing something a third less severe than what a black student is currently suspended for, or black students will have to be suspended only when they do something three times more severe than what they are currently being suspended for!”

They are absolutely right.  Blacks are suspended from school at a higher rate than whites because they misbehave at a higher rate than whites.  This…what’s the juvenile delinquent equivalent of the dreaded “achievement gap?”…”punishment gap” can only be closed in one of two ways:

1.  Punishing white students for trivial/minor offenses for which minorities get a pass.

2.  Allowing black students to get away with serious/major offenses for which white students would be punished.

In reality, a combination of both will happen.  Either way, it’s a two-tiered disciplinary system for white students.  Black students will do bad things, like steal from other students’ lockers.  Then, when they aren’t punished for it, because the black suspension quota for the semester has already been filled, they will be encouraged, and will steal even more.  When the school administrators finally have enough, and suspend the multiple offender, they’ll need to suspend a couple of white kids also…lest the ratio get too imbalanced.  As all white offenders have already been suspended…any two will have to do!  So that means that the next kid who shows up to class 5 minutes late, or talks in class, is going to have the hammer dropped on him

My question is this…when the day comes that a white kid gets expelled for chewing gum…will Hannity et al. highlight his plight, and point out how ridiculous and unjust the punishment was? Of course not…because it was done in the name of fighting racial injustice, and if Hannity and friends cannot bring themselves to admit that there are racial differences in behavior, then the only explanation for racial differences in punishment would be…white racism.  Hannity will probably end up calling the kid a terrorist…and recommend that we “rendition” this little bastard to Guantanamo Bay for some water-boarding.  Just tell the Wall Street Journal that he was an anti-semite…that should placate their sense of justice.

How does the Disparate Planet plan for dealing with a hostile elite fit in here?:

“Divorce yourself as much as possible from American institutions, which actively seek to displace you, so that you no longer have an interest in whether or not they collapse.”

Simple…If you can afford to, homeschool your kids!

Wonder if they’ll be charged with “hate crimes?”

March 13, 2010

Two more incidents of blacks attacking whites, and boldly proclaiming the racial motivation behind the attacks:

First, from Cincinnati, via Nation of Cowards:

“Black, dubbed the Lytle Park rapist because one of his victims was raped at 9 a.m. in the Downtown public park, became a poster child for those calling for a new jail. Before the May 4 incident was reported, Black had been arrested five times in the previous six months but released each time because there was no room in the jail for him.”

“Black had been arrested five times in the previous six months but released each time because there was no room in the jail for him.”…Detroit, Cincinnati, Zimbabwe…Black Rule leads to the same result no matter where it occurs…failure.

“She was a student at a West End school when she went Feb. 18, 2009, to Over-the-Rhine to buy marijuana. She met Black, 21, who asked to borrow her cell phone so he could make the deal. He took her inside an Over-the-Rhine, building and to the third-floor landing. When they stopped climbing stairs, the girl was trapped and knew she was in trouble.

Nobody cares about a white b—- in Over-the-Rhine,” Black told her, court documents note.”

Will he be charged with a hate crime?  I couldn’t find an answer one way or another (let me know if you find out)…but I wouldn’t hold my breath.

The second story comes from Dallas, via American Renaissance:

AmRen has an interesting notation:

[The above story is a copy cached by Yahoo! The current version of the story differs in many respects from this cached version; in particular, the passage in boldface has been excised. The current version of the story can be read here.]”

I couldn’t get the link to work.  Another great example of media objectivity if you ask me!  The passage referred to is this:

When Pfeifle, the prosecutor, asked if Lacey showed any remorse, LaShaunda Johnson replied: “He said if it made me feel better, I could just think she was prejudiced.” She testified that according to her boyfriend, Reiter probably didn’t like black people, “and her family probably owned slaves.””

This is the murderer discussing his killing of the victim.  The motivation sounds pretty clear to me.  Again, I was unable to find out whether or not he was charged with a “hate crime,” but I highly doubt it.

These are just two of many examples of the two-tiered legal system that whites face in the form of “hate crimes” laws.  If a white person commits an offense against a minority, “hate” is automatically presumed to be the motivation.  If a minority commits an offense against a white, and explicitly states the racial motivation behind the crime, then…well…all of a suddent “hate crimes” laws aren’t such a vital law enforcement tool.  I would be interested to know if any whites in these two jurisdictions have been charged with “hate crimes.”  If they have, especially with less evidence as to motivation, it would appear to be selective enforcement of these laws.  I’ve already documented two examples where whites were charged with “hate crimes,” and later on, in the same exact jurisdiction, minorities committed crimes against whites, with explicit racial motivation, without resulting “hate crimes” charges.  If there are any attorneys out there who might know the legal requirements for appealing a case based on “selective enforcement”, please contact me and let me know.  Also, if you have any other examples where, in the same jurisdiction, whites who committed crimes against minorities were charged with “hate crimes,” and minorities who committed crimes against whites, with explicit racial motivation, were not, please let me know.

So far, the Disparate Planet First Law of Interracial Crime has yet to be disproven:

“Any crime committed by whites against a minority will result in additional charges/prison time.  Any crime committed against whites by minorities will be met with the bare minimum of charges/prison time…if that.”

Another tradition that whites will have to get over very soon is their deification of law enforcement.  The criminal justice system has ceased to function in support of the interests of white communities, and is now essentially the enforcement arm of our hostile elite, or white Peter Brimelow referred to as our “minority occupation government.”  Whites for some reason still think that the criminal justice system really wants to protect them from dangerous minorities.  Just remember…when their superiors tell them to stop focusing on trivial offenses such as assault and murder, and instead focus on real crimes, such as a harmless sign in some white guy’s front yard…they’ll say “yes sir” and drag him off to jail without a second thought.

You really should click  the link about the yard sign.  It includes this priceless gem:

““I’m telling you this is what I was, was ready to go to jail today and take that noose down,” said community activist Queen Sister, with It Takes a Village.”

If we were playing “Guess My Occupation,” and you gave me the name “Queen Sister,” my first two choices would be either “community activist” or “unemployed”…looks like I was right!

Missouri Penal Code – Section 27g: Bias-Motivated-Felony-Crime-Reporting

March 11, 2010

Okay, I’m just kidding.  I don’t think that that’s an actual codified crime in the state of Missouri…yet.

James Edwards at The Political Cesspool covers a Council of Conservative Citizens report:

“In the Waldo neighborhood of Kansas City, a serial rapist is on the loose. He’s black, and the police have released a sketch of the suspect based on interviews with the victims. The other day a white man saw a black man in the area who matched the description, so he called the cops. Now “civil rights leaders” are demanding that the police charge the white man with “ethnic intimidation, i.e. a hate crime, for being a good citizen.”

So far, I haven’t heard whether or not this good samaritan has actually been charged with anything…but it wouldn’t surprise me if he has or will be.  I’m constantly told by the supporters of “hate crimes” laws that the thought behind the crime isn’t being punished, just the amount of “cold-bloodedness” that went into its commission.  The example always given is that pre-meditated murder is usually punished more harshly than murder committed in the heat of passion.  But the unjustifiable homicide itself is still a crime, the motivation behind it just influences how harsh the sentence is.  That isn’t the case here.  A citizen calling in a police tip, in good faith, which turns out to be incorrect, is not a crime.  Unless of course it’s a white citizen reporting a black citizen.  So this isn’t a case of motivation influencing the harshness of a sentence, it’s a case of race determining whether or not a crime even occurred.  This is yet another example of the two-tiered legal system that whites face.  The governments that rule you, at all levels from local to federal, would love nothing more than to throw you in jail for life if you even so much as offend the delicate sensibilities of a minority!

U…S…A…U…S…A…U…S…A…What’s that?…You’re not chanting along?…What are you?…Some kind of liberal/commie/terrorist?…Nothing a Sean Hannity “Freedom Concert” (at least I think that’s what they’re called) won’t fix!

So the next time you hear that moron Hannity or some other GOP hack complaining about Democrats being “soft on crime” because they want to spend money on welfare for minorities instead of on funding for law enforcement, just remember this…that money probably would have just gone to fund the department’s new “Hate Crimes Unit” anyway.

Drop out of American Institutions…Build Your Own…Prosper.